The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure−Activity Relationships for a Large Diverse Set of Natural, Synthetic, and Environmental Estrogens
Abstract
Understanding structural requirements for a chemical to exhibit estrogen receptor (ER) binding has been important in various fields. This knowledge has been directly and indirectly applied to design drugs for human estrogen replacement therapy, and to identify estrogenic endocrine disruptors. This paper reports structure-activity relationships (SARs) based on a total of 230 chemicals, including both natural and xenoestrogens. Activities were generated using a validated ER competitive binding assay, which covers a 10(6)-fold range. This study is focused on identification of structural commonalities among diverse ER ligands. It provides an overall picture of how xenoestrogens structurally resemble endogenous 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) and the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). On the basis of SAR analysis, five distinguishing criteria were found to be essential for xenoestrogen activity, using E(2) as a template: (1) H-bonding ability of the phenolic ring mimicking the 3-OH, (2) H-bond donor mimicking the17beta-OH and O-O distance between 3- and 17beta-OH, (3) precise steric hydrophobic centers mimicking steric 7alpha- and 11beta-substituents, (4) hydrophobicity, and (5) a ring structure. The 3-position H-bonding ability of phenols is a significant requirement for ER binding. This contributes as both a H-bond donor and acceptor, although predominantly as a donor. However, the 17beta-OH contributes as a H-bond donor only. The precise space (the size and orientation) of steric hydrophobic bulk groups is as important as a 17beta-OH. Where a direct comparison can be made, strong estrogens tend to be more hydrophobic. A rigid ring structure favors ER binding. The knowledge derived from this study is rationalized into a set of hierarchical rules that will be useful in guidance for identification of potential estrogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.
Huang, N., Shoichet, B. K., & Irwin, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0608356 · Cited by 1,318
Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours
Darbre, P. D., Aljarrah, A., Miller, W. R., Coldham, N. G., Sauer, M. J., & Pope, G. S. (2004) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.958 · Cited by 805
Isoflavones: estrogenic activity, biological effect and bioavailability
Vitale, D. C., Piazza, C., Melilli, B., Drago, F., & Salomone, S. (2013) · European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s13318-012-0112-y · Cited by 490
Darbre, P. D. (2006) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.1135 · Cited by 295
Zhu, B. T., Han, G.-Z., Shim, J.-Y., Wen, Y., & Jiang, X.-R. (2006) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2006-0113 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, H., Tong, W., Shi, L. M., Blair, R., Perkins, R., Branham, W., Hass, B. S., Xie, Q., Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L., & Sheehan, D. M.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-02-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 280-294
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2055878543
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure−Activity Relationships for a Large Diverse Set of Natural, Synthetic, and Environmental Estrogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/tx000208y
- The paper
- Fang, H., Tong, W., Shi, L. M., Blair, R., Perkins, R., Branham, W., Hass, B. S., Xie, Q., Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L., & Sheehan, D. M. (2001). Structure−Activity Relationships for a Large Diverse Set of Natural, Synthetic, and Environmental Estrogens. Chemical Research in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx000208y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.