The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization and quantitation of urinary metabolites of [1,2,3-13C]acrylamide in rats and mice using carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Abstract
Acrylamide, widely used for the production of polymers and as a grouting agent, causes neurotoxic effects in humans and neurotoxic, genotoxic, reproductive, and carcinogenic effects in laboratory animals. In this study, 13C NMR spectroscopy was used to detect metabolites of acrylamide directly in the urine of rats and mice following administration of [1,2,3-13C]acrylamide (50 mg/kg po). Two-dimensional NMR experiments were used to correlate carbon signals for each metabolite in the urine samples and to determine the number of hydrogens attached to each carbon. Metabolite structures were identified from the NMR data together with calculated values of shift for biochemically feasible metabolites and by comparison with standards. The metabolites assigned in rat and mouse urine are N-acetyl-S-(3-amino-3-oxopropyl)cysteine, N-acetyl-S-(3-amino-2-hydroxy-3-oxopropyl)cysteine, N-acetyl-S-(1-carbamoyl-2-hydroxy-ethyl)cysteine, glycidamide, and 2,3-dihydroxypropionamide. These metabolites arise from direct conjugation of acrylamide with glutathione or from oxidation to the epoxide, glycidamide, and further metabolism. Acrylamide was also detected in the urine. Quantitation was carried out by integrating the metabolite carbon signals with respect to that of dioxane added at a known concentration. The major metabolite for both the rat (70% of total metabolites excreted) and the mouse (40%) was formed from direct conjugation of acrylamide with glutathione. The remaining metabolites for the rat (30%) and mouse (60%) are derived from glycidamide. The species differences in extent of metabolism through glycidamide may have important consequences for the toxic and carcinogenic effects of acrylamide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scientific Opinion on acrylamide in food
(CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C. (2015) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4104 · Cited by 828
Human exposure and internal dose assessments of acrylamide in food
Dybing, E., Farmer, P. B., Andersen, M., Fennell, T. R., Lalljie, S. P. D., Müller, D. J. G., Olin, S., Petersen, B. J., Schlatter, J., Scholz, G., et al. (2005) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.11.004 · Cited by 395
Self-citationThe Carcinogenicity of Acrylamide
Rice, J. M. (2005) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.09.008 · Cited by 329
The Changing View of Acrylamide Neurotoxicity
LoPachin, R. M. (2004) · NeuroToxicology · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2004.01.004 · Cited by 310
Acrylamide: Review of Toxicity Data and Dose-Response Analyses for Cancer and Noncancer Effects
Shipp, A., Lawrence, G., Gentry, R., McDonald, T., Bartow, H., Bounds, J., Macdonald, N., Clewell, H., Allen, B., & Van Landingham, C. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440600851377 · Cited by 305
Acrylamide: a review of its genotoxicity and an assessment of heritable genetic risk
Dearfield, K. L., Douglas, G. R., Ehling, U. H., Moore, M. M., Sega, G. A., & Brusick, D. J. (1995) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/0027-5107(95)00037-j · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Sumner, S. C. J., MacNeela, J. P., & Fennell, T. R.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-89
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2039153047
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.