The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
4-Oxo-2-nonenal Is Both More Neurotoxic and More Protein Reactive than 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal
Abstract
Electrophilic aldehydes, generated from oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acyl chains under conditions of oxidative stress, bind to proteins and polynucleotides and can lead to cell death. 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) and 4-oxo-2-nonenal (ONE) have been shown here to be toxic to human neuroblastoma cells in culture at low micromolar concentrations. ONE is 4-5 times more neurotoxic at concentrations near the threshold of lethality. The reactions of these two aldehydes with two model proteins, ribonuclease A and beta-lactoglobulin, and their Lys epsilon-dimethylamino derivatives, have been followed spectrophotometrically. On the basis of t(1/2) measurements for the disappearance of the alpha,beta-unsaturated chromophore, ONE is 6-31 times more reactive with these proteins. The fastest reaction of ONE with proteins involves Schiff base formation at Lys epsilon-amino groups, whereas Schiff base formation is not spectroscopically apparent for HNE. Detailed kinetic studies of the initial reactions of HNE and ONE have been carried out with amino acids and amino acid surrogates. Whereas the reactions with imidazole and thiol nucleophiles involve straightforward Michael adduct formation, kinetics analyses reveal the reversibility of both the HNE Michael adduction of amines and the ONE Schiff base adduction of amines. Although ONE is more reactive than HNE toward conjugate addition of imidazole and thiol nucleophiles, it is less reactive than HNE toward Lys/amine Michael adduction. The greater neurotoxicity of ONE could reflect in part the different reactivity characteristics of ONE as compared to HNE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Keller, J. N., & Mattson, M. P. (1998) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro.1998.9.2.105 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Oxidative Stress and Neurotoxicity
Sayre, L. M., Perry, G., & Smith, M. A. (2008) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx700210j · Cited by 867
Self-citationVistoli, G., De Maddis, D., Cipak, A., Zarkovic, N., Carini, M., & Aldini, G. (2013) · Free Radical Research · doi:10.3109/10715762.2013.815348 · Cited by 823
Transient Receptor Potential A1 Is a Sensory Receptor for Multiple Products of Oxidative Stress
Andersson, D. A., Gentry, C., Moss, S., & Bevan, S. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5369-07.2008 · Cited by 718
Oxidative Stress and Covalent Modification of Protein with Bioactive Aldehydes
Grimsrud, P. A., Xie, H., Griffin, T. J., & Bernlohr, D. A. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r700019200 · Cited by 572
Adibhatla, R. M., & Hatcher, J. F. (2010) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2009.2668 · Cited by 480
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, D., Lee, H.-G., Liu, Q., Perry, G., Smith, M. A., & Sayre, L. M.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-07-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1219-1231
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W1987817022
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 4-Oxo-2-nonenal Is Both More Neurotoxic and More Protein Reactive than 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/tx050080q
- The paper
- Lin, D., Lee, H.-G., Liu, Q., Perry, G., Smith, M. A., & Sayre, L. M. (2005). 4-Oxo-2-nonenal Is Both More Neurotoxic and More Protein Reactive than 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal. Chemical Research in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx050080q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.