The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity Using QSAR and Toxicogenomics Approaches
Open accessAbstract
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling and toxicogenomics are typically used independently as predictive tools in toxicology. In this study, we evaluated the power of several statistical models for predicting drug hepatotoxicity in rats using different descriptors of drug molecules, namely, their chemical descriptors and toxicogenomics profiles. The records were taken from the Toxicogenomics Project rat liver microarray database containing information on 127 drugs ( http://toxico.nibio.go.jp/datalist.html ). The model end point was hepatotoxicity in the rat following 28 days of continuous exposure, established by liver histopathology and serum chemistry. First, we developed multiple conventional QSAR classification models using a comprehensive set of chemical descriptors and several classification methods (k nearest neighbor, support vector machines, random forests, and distance weighted discrimination). With chemical descriptors alone, external predictivity (correct classification rate, CCR) from 5-fold external cross-validation was 61%. Next, the same classification methods were employed to build models using only toxicogenomics data (24 h after a single exposure) treated as biological descriptors. The optimized models used only 85 selected toxicogenomics descriptors and had CCR as high as 76%. Finally, hybrid models combining both chemical descriptors and transcripts were developed; their CCRs were between 68 and 77%. Although the accuracy of hybrid models did not exceed that of the models based on toxicogenomics data alone, the use of both chemical and biological descriptors enriched the interpretation of the models. In addition to finding 85 transcripts that were predictive and highly relevant to the mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury, chemical structural alerts for hepatotoxicity were identified. These results suggest that concurrent exploration of the chemical features and acute treatment-induced changes in transcript levels will both enrich the mechanistic understanding of subchronic liver injury and afford models capable of accurate prediction of hepatotoxicity from chemical structure and short-term assay results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1093-3263(01)00123-1 · Cited by 3,735 · cited 1×
“, internal validation) since training set accuracy alone is insufficient to establish robust and externally predictive models (26).”
Self-citationOn Outliers and Activity CliffsWhy QSAR Often Disappoints
Maggiora, G. M. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci060117s · Cited by 728
Parviz, F., Matullo, C., Garrison, W. D., Savatski, L., Adamson, J. W., Ning, G., Kaestner, K. H., Rossi, J. M., Zaret, K. S., & Duncan, S. A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1175 · Cited by 588
Why Drugs Fail - A Study on Side Effects in New Chemical Entities
Schuster, D., Laggner, C., & Langer, T. (2005) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/138161205774414510 · Cited by 417
Sedykh, A., Zhu, H., Tang, H., Zhang, L., Richard, A., Rusyn, I., & Tropsha, A. (2011) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1002476 · Cited by 119
Self-citationPer Aspera Ad Astra : Application of Simplex Qsar Approach in Antiviral Research
Muratov, E. N., Artemenko, A. G., Varlamova, E. V., Polischuk, P. G., Lozitsky, V. P., Fedchuk, A. S., Lozitska, R. L., Gridina, T. L., Koroleva, L. S., Sil’nikov, V. N., et al. (2010) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.10.194 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Cited by
Trust, but Verify II: A Practical Guide to Chemogenomics Data Curation
Fourches, D., Muratov, E., & Tropsha, A. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00129 · Cited by 294
Self-citationLagorce, D., Douguet, D., Miteva, M. A., & Villoutreix, B. O. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46277 · Cited by 266
Marchese Robinson, R. L., Palczewska, A., Palczewski, J., & Kidley, N. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00753 · Cited by 167
Zhu, H., Zhang, J., Kim, M. T., Boison, A., Sedykh, A., & Moran, K. (2014) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx500145h · Cited by 154
Self-citationSu, R., Wu, H., Xu, B., Liu, X., & Wei, L. (2019) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2018.2858756 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Low, Y., Uehara, T., Minowa, Y., Yamada, H., Ohno, Y., Urushidani, T., Sedykh, A., Muratov, E., Kuz’min, V., Fourches, D., Zhu, H., Rusyn, I., & Tropsha, A.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-07-21
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1251-1262
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2052396986
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity Using QSAR and Toxicogenomics Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/tx200148a
- The paper
- Low, Y., Uehara, T., Minowa, Y., Yamada, H., Ohno, Y., Urushidani, T., Sedykh, A., Muratov, E., Kuz’min, V., Fourches, D., Zhu, H., Rusyn, I., & Tropsha, A. (2011). Predicting Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity Using QSAR and Toxicogenomics Approaches. Chemical Research in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx200148a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.