The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial Activity of Sulfamethoxazole Transformation Products (TPs): General Relevance for Sulfonamide TPs Modified at the para Position
Open accessAbstract
Sulfonamide antibiotics undergo transformation in the aquatic environment through biodegradation, photolysis, or hydrolysis. In this study, the residual antibacterial activity of 11 transformation products (TPs) of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) was investigated with regard to their in vitro growth and luminescence inhibition on Vibrio fischeri (30 min and 24 h exposure). Two transformation products, 4-hydroxy-SMX and N(4)-hydroxy-acetyl-SMX, were synthesized in-house and confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Results of individual compound experiments showed that TPs modified at the para amino group still exhibit clear antibacterial effects, whereas TPs resulting from breakdown of the SMX structure lost this mechanism of action. 4-NO2- and 4-OH-SMX were found to inhibit growth to a clearly greater extent than the parent compound, SMX. In contrast, the N(4)-acetyl- and N(4)-hydroxy-acetyl-derivatives retain less than 10 and 5% of the effect of SMX on growth and luminescence inhibition, respectively. The effect of a mixture of para-modified TPs was observed to be additive. Considering the homologous series of sulfa drugs widely prescribed and their common mechanism of action, the potential environmental impact must consider the total amount of sulfonamide antibiotics and their derivative TPs, which might end up in a water body. Extrapolating the results obtained here for the para TPs of SMX to other sulfa drugs and determining the persistence and occurrence of these compounds in the aquatic environment is required for improved risk assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heberer, T. (2002) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00041-3 · Cited by 2,995
Cited by
Yang, Y., Lu, X., Jiang, J., Ma, J., Liu, G., Cao, Y., Liu, W., Li, J., Pang, S., Kong, X., et al. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.054 · Cited by 637
Antimicrobial pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment - occurrence and environmental implications
Felis, E., Kalka, J., Sochacki, A., Kowalska, K., Bajkacz, S., Harnisz, M., & Korzeniewska, E. (2020) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172813 · Cited by 437
Mutuku, C., Gazdag, Z., & Melegh, S. (2022) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-022-03334-0 · Cited by 280
Insights on Sulfamethoxazole Bio-Transformation by Environmental Proteobacteria Isolates
Reis, P. J. M., Homem, V., Alves, A., Vilar, V. J. P., Manaia, C. M., & Nunes, O. C. (2018) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.012 · Cited by 80
Biodegradation of sulfamethoxazole photo-transformation products in a water/sediment test
Su, T., Deng, H., Benskin, J. P., & Radke, M. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.049 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Majewsky, M., Wagner, D., Delay, M., Bräse, S., Yargeau, V., & Horn, H.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-09-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1821-1828
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2316746737
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.