Cited by 80Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Insights on Sulfamethoxazole Bio-Transformation by Environmental Proteobacteria Isolates

Reis, Patrícia J.M., Homem, Vera, Alves, Arminda, Vilar, Vítor J.P., Manaia, Célia M., Nunes, Olga C.·2018·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

Although sulfonamide residues are frequently reported as freshwaters contaminants, information on the ability of native bacteria to modify these synthetic antibiotics is scarce. Our purpose was to investigate the potential of bacteria from different aquatic environments to cleave or transform sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and infer on their ability to reduce the toxicity of this antibiotic. From a collection of about 100 Proteobacteria, 47 strains previously isolated from drinking water, surface water, and wastewater grew in the presence of 200 μM SMX, and were further studied. Out of these, 14 strains, mostly from mineral drinking water, transformed SMX into equimolar amounts of the lesser toxic derivative N 4-acetyl-sulfamethoxazole. The highest percentage of SMX transformation was recorded for two strains affiliated to Pseudomonas mandelii. For P. mandelii McBPA4 higher SMX transformation rate and extent were observed in fed-batch (∼8 μM SMX/h, 81%) than in batch conditions (∼5 μM SMX/h, 25%), but similar specific transformation rates were found in both cultivation modes (∼20 μmol SMX/g cell dry weight/h), indicating the dependence of the process on the microbial load. These results evidence that the capacity to transform synthetic antibiotics may be common among bacteria and highlight the potential of environmental bacteria in attenuating the potential adverse effects of pollution with sulfonamides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.012

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reis, P. J. M., Homem, V., Alves, A., Vilar, V. J. P., Manaia, C. M., & Nunes, O. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT)
Corresponding author
Nunes, Olga C.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
358
Pages
310-318
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810136725
Cited by
80
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  • FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • North Portugal Regional Operational Programme
  • QREN-POPH
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
sulfamethoxazole, Proteobacteria, Pseudomonas mandelii, antibiotic degradation, wastewater bacteria, microbial load
MeSH terms
Biotransformation, Fresh Water, Genes, Bacterial, Kinetics, Models, Theoretical, Sulfamethoxazole, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Proteobacteria, Drinking Water, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review