The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Allergic Contact Dermatitis––Formation, Structural Requirements, and Reactivity of Skin Sensitizers
Abstract
Contact allergy is caused by a wide range of chemicals after skin contact. Its clinical manifestation, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), is developed upon repeated contact with the allergen. This perspective focuses on two areas that have yielded new useful information during the last 20 years: (i) structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of contact allergy based on the concept of hapten-protein binding and (ii) mechanistic investigations regarding activation of nonsensitizing compounds to contact allergens by air oxidation or skin metabolism. The second area is more thoroughly reviewed since the full picture has previously not been published. Prediction of the sensitizing capacity of a chemical is important to avoid outbreaks of ACD in the population. Much research has been devoted to the development of in vitro and in silico predictive testing methods. Today, no method exists that is sensitive enough to detect weak allergens and that is robust enough to be used for routine screening. To cause sensitization, a chemical must bind to macromolecules (proteins) in the skin. Expert systems containing information about the relationship between the chemical structure and the ability of chemicals to haptenate proteins are available. However, few designed SAR studies based on mechanistic investigations of prohaptens have been published. Many compounds are not allergenic themselves but are activated in the skin (e.g., metabolically) or before skin contact (e.g., via air oxidation) to form skin sensitizers. Thus, more basic research is needed on the chemical reactions involved in the antigen formation and the immunological mechanisms. The clinical importance of air oxidation to activate nonallergenic compounds has been demonstrated. Oxidized fragrance terpenes, in contrast to the pure terpenes, gave positive patch test reactions in consecutive dermatitis patients as frequently as the most common standard allergens. This shows the importance of using compounds to which people are exposed when screening for ACD in dermatology clinics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stability of Essential Oils: A Review
Turek, C., & Stintzing, F. C. (2013) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12006 · Cited by 1,315
Oxidized Limonene and Oxidized Linalool—Concomitant Contact Allergy to Common Fragrance Terpenes
Bråred Christensson, J., Karlberg, A., Andersen, K. E., Bruze, M., Johansen, J. D., Garcia‐Bravo, B., Giménez Arnau, A., Goh, C., Nixon, R., & White, I. R. (2016) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/cod.12545 · Cited by 66
Self-citationPlant polyphenols and human skin: Friends or foes
Korkina, L., De Luca, C., & Pastore, S. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06510.x · Cited by 47
Hieda, D. S., Anastacio da Costa Carvalho, L., Vaz de Mello, B., Oliveira, E. A. D., Romano de Assis, S., Wu, J., Du-Thumm, L., Viana da Silva, C. L., Roubicek, D. A., Maria-Engler, S. S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2020.03.971 · Cited by 47
Arnesdotter, E., Rogiers, V., Vanhaecke, T., & Vinken, M. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408444.2021.1931027 · Cited by 27
Contact Allergy to Fragrances: Current Clinical and Regulatory Trends
Uter, W. (2017) · Allergologie select · doi:10.5414/alx01604e · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Karlberg, A.-T., Bergström, M. A., Börje, A., Luthman, K., & Nilsson, J. L. G.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-12-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-69
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2084694949
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.