Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chemometric Models for Toxicity Classification Based on NMR Spectra of Biofluids

Holmes, Elaine, Nicholls, Andrew W., Lindon, John C., Connor, Susan C., Connelly, John C., Haselden, John N., Damment, Stephen J. P., Spraul, Manfred, Neidig, Peter, Nicholson, Jeremy K.·2000·Chemical Research in Toxicology

Abstract

1H NMR spectroscopic and pattern recognition (PR)-based methods were used to investigate the biochemical variability in urine obtained from control rats and from rats treated with a hydrazine (a model hepatotoxin) or HgCl(2) (a model renal cortical toxin). The 600 MHz (1)H NMR spectra of urine samples obtained from vehicle- or toxin-treated Han-Wistar (HW) and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were acquired, and principal components analysis (PCA) and soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) analysis were used to investigate the (1)H NMR spectral data. Variation and strain differences in the biochemical composition of control urine samples were assessed. Control urine (1)H NMR spectra obtained from the two rat strains appeared visually similar. However, chemometric analysis of the control urine spectra indicated that HW rat urine contained relatively higher concentrations of lactate, acetate, and taurine and lower concentrations of hippurate than SD rat urine. Having established the extent of biochemical variation in the two populations of control rats, PCA was used to evaluate the metabolic effects of hydrazine and HgCl(2) toxicity. Urinary biomarkers of each class of toxicity were elucidated from the PC loadings and included organic acids, amino acids, and sugars in the case of mercury, while levels of taurine, beta-alanine, creatine, and 2-aminoadipate were elevated after hydrazine treatment. SIMCA analysis of the data was used to build predictive models (from a training set of 416 samples) for the classification of toxicity type and strain of rat, and the models were tested using an independent set of urine samples (n = 124). Using models constructed from the first three PCs, 98% of the test samples were correctly classified as originating from control, hydrazine-treated, or HgCl(2)-treated rats. Furthermore, this method was sensitive enough to predict the correct strain of the control samples for 79% of the data, based upon the class of best fit. Incorporation of these chemometric methods into automated NMR-based metabonomics analysis will enable on-line toxicological assessment of biofluids and will provide a tool for probing the mechanistic basis of organ toxicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/tx990210t

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Holmes, E., Nicholls, A. W., Lindon, J. C., Connor, S. C., Connelly, J. C., Haselden, J. N., Damment, S. J. P., Spraul, M., Neidig, P., & Nicholson, J. K.
Venue
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2000-05-06
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
471-478
ISSN
  • 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5010
OpenAlex
W2036373055
Cited by
276
References
0
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.