Cited by 90Innovative Education and Learning PracticesInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Activity Theory and System Design: A View from the Trenches

Collins, Patricia, Shukla, Shilpa, Redmiles, David·2002·Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015219918601

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Engeström, Yrjo (1990): When is a Tool? Multiple Meanings of Artifacts in Human Activity. In Yrjo Engeström (ed.): Learning, Working and Imagining. Painettu Kirjapaino Oma Ky:ssa, Jyvaskylassa.
  2. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978): Mind in Society. Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
Collins, P., Shukla, S., & Redmiles, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Published
2002-03
Volume
11
Issue
1-2
Pages
55-80
ISSN
  • 0925-9724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7551
OpenAlex
W2083870309
Cited by
90
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
19.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
activity theory, mediating artifacts, Engeström, tool design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity Theory and System Design: A View from the Trenches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1015219918601
The paper
Collins, P., Shukla, S., & Redmiles, D. (2002). Activity Theory and System Design: A View from the Trenches. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1015219918601