Cited by 68Protein Structure and DynamicsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correction of the NMR structure of the ETS1/DNA complex

Abstract

The ETS family of transcription factors consists of a group of proteins that share a highly conserved 85 amino acid DNA-binding domain (DBD). This family recognizes a consensus sequence rich in purine bases with a central GGAA motif. A comparison of the published three-dimensional structures of the DBD/DNA complexes of ETS1 by NMR [Werner et al. (1995) Cell, 83, 761-771] and the related Pu.1 by X-ray crystallography [Kodandapani et al. (1996) Nature, 380, 456-460] reveals an apparent discrepancy in which the protein domains bind with opposite polarity to their target sequences. This surprising and highly unlikely result prompted us to reexamine our NMR structure. Additional NMR experiments now reveal an error in the original interpretation of the spectra defining the orientation of the ETS1-DBD on DNA. It was originally reported that the ETS1-DBD bound to DNA with a bipartite motif involving major groove recognition via a helix-turn-helix element and minor groove recognition via protein side-chain intercalation. The presence of intercalation was deduced on the basis of numerous NOEs between several amino acids in the protein and a resonance at 12.33 ppm originally assigned to a DNA imino proton. New NMR experiments now conclusively demonstrate that this resonance, which is located within the DNA imino proton region of the spectrum, arises from the hydroxyl proton of Tyr86. Realization of this error necessitated reanalysis of the intermolecular NOEs. This revealed that the orientation of the ETS1-DBD in the complex is opposite to that originally reported and that a tryptophan residue does not intercalate into the DNA. The calculation of a new ensemble of structures based on the corrected data indicates that the structure of the ETS1-DBD/DNA complex is indeed similar to the X-ray structure of the Pu.1-DBD/DNA complex.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018399711996

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overall structure and DNA-binding mechanism of the ETS domain is based on high-resolution molecular models of ten family members from X-ray crystallography and NMR.

    “The overall structure and DNA-binding mechanism of the ETS domain is based on high-resolution molecular models of ten family members derived from both X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Figure 1b, Supplemental Table 2) (37–51).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Brünger, A.T. (1993) XPLOR Manual Version 3.1, Yale University, New Haven, CT, U.S.A.
  2. Fisher, R.J., Mavrothalassitis, G., Kondoh, A. and Papas, T.S. (1991) Oncogene, 6, 2249–2254.
  3. Galson, D.L. and Housman, D.E. (1988) Mol.Cell.Biol., 8, 381–392.
  4. Galson, D.L., Hensold, J.O., Bishop, T.R., Schalling, M., D'Andrea, A.D., Jones, C., Auron, P.E. and Housman, D.E. (1993) Mol.Cell. Biol., 13, 2929–2941.
  5. Garrett, D.S., Powers, R., Gronenborn, A.M. and Clore, G.M. (1991) J.Magn.Reson., 95, 214–220.
  6. Hromas, R. and Klemsz, M. (1994) Int.J.Hematol., 59, 257–265.
  7. Morris, A.L., MacArthur, M.W., Hutchinson, E.G. and Thornton, A.M. (1992) Proteins Struct.Funct.Genet., 78, 1595–1620.
  8. Ray-Gallet, D., Mao, C., Tavitian, A. and Moreau-Gachelin, F. (1995) Oncogene, 11, 303–313.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Werner, M. H., Clore, G. M., Fisher, C. L., Fisher, R. J., Trinh, L., Shiloach, J., & Gronenborn, A. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US)
Venue
Journal of Biomolecular NMR
Published
1997-12
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
317-328
ISSN
  • 0925-2738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5001
OpenAlex
W155985007
Cited by
68
References
46
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomolecular NMR (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
ETS1, DNA-binding domain, protein-DNA complex, transcription factors, PU.1, intercalation, helix-turn-helix, major groove recognition, minor groove recognition, structure correction, NOE assignment, structure ensemble
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protein Binding, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Transcription Factors, Crystallography, X-Ray, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ets, Proto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review