Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Fiscal Policies and Political EconomyEconomic and Fiscal StudiesPolitics, Economics, and Education Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Was “V” for victory or votes? A public choice analysis of World War II federal spending

Bateman, Fred, Taylor, Jason E.·2003·Public Choice

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020844426073

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Bateman, F., & Taylor, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Public Choice
Published
2003-01
Volume
114
Issue
1-2
Pages
161-174
ISSN
  • 0048-5829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7101
OpenAlex
W1548795527
Cited by
4
References
8
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Public Choice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
Keywords
World War II, federal spending, New Deal, defense spending, interest groups, big government, 1940s

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Was “V” for victory or votes? A public choice analysis of World War II federal spending. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1020844426073
The paper
Bateman, F., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Was “V” for victory or votes? A public choice analysis of World War II federal spending. Public Choice. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1020844426073

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.