The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A macro study of self-citation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Aksnes (2003) shows that the lowest percentage of self-citations in publications by Norwegian authors is in clinical medicine (17%) and the highest percentage is in chemistry and astrophysics (31%).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Aksnes, 2003
In the citing paper
“Costas et al. (2010) and Aksnes (2003) similarly report that the number of self-citations increases with the number of authors of the citing document.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Aksnes, 2003
In the citing paper
“The results of Aksnes (2003) and Glänzel and Thijs (2004) reveal, however, that the increase in the number of self-citations might play a minor role in the overall increase in citation rates.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Aksnes, 2003
Citations
Cites
Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities
Goodwin, J., & Garfield, E. (1980) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3104125 · Cited by 1,648
Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?
Garfield, E. (1979) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02019306 · Cited by 911
Problems of citation analysis: A critical review
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198909)40:5 · Cited by 807
An introduction to informetrics
Tague‐Sutcliffe, J. (1992) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(92)90087-g · Cited by 763
Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990) · E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II) · Cited by 386
Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb00175.x · Cited by 268
The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results
van Raan, A. F. J. (1998) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02458380 · Cited by 263
Garfield, E., & Welljams-Dorof, A. (1992) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/spp/19.5.321 · Cited by 190
A compendium of issues for citation analysis
Phelan, T. J. (1999) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02458472 · Cited by 174
Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989)
Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/016555159802400606 · Cited by 150
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- S. Bonzi, H. W. Snyder, Patterns of self citation across fields of inquiry, Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 27 (1990) 204–207.
- T. N. van Leeuwen, E. J. Rinia, A. F. J. van Raan, Bibliometric Profiles of Academic Physics Research in the Netherlands. Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS 96–09, Leiden, 1996.
- H. F. Moed, J. G. M. van der Velde, Bibliometric Profiles of Academic Chemistry Research in the Netherlands, Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS-93–08, Leiden, 1993.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356
Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities
Wallin, J. A. (2005) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x · Cited by 913
Expert credibility in climate change
Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107 · Cited by 872
Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900
Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23266 · Cited by 484
Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2008) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Aksnes, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Aksnes, Dag W.
- ORCID
- Aksnes, Dag W.
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-246
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2131409840
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- self-citation, citation analysis, citation metrics, research evaluation, multi-author papers, disciplinary variation, citation counts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
