The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Impact of Performance-Contingent Rewards on Perceived Autonomy and Competence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Offering external rewards for partaking in an interesting activity can undermine intrinsic motivation, presumably because controlling rewards shift perceived locus of causality from internal to external, diminishing autonomy.
“In contrast, offering external rewards for partaking in an interesting activity can undermine intrinsic motivation (Deci et al. 1999), presumably because controlling rewards can shift one's perceived locus of causality (deCharms 1968) from internal to external, thereby diminishing a sense of autonomy (Houlfort et al. 2002).”
From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Houlfort et al. 2002
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 27 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Houlfort, N., Koestner, R., Joussemet, M., Nantel-Vivier, A., & Lekes, N.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Koestner, Richard
- Venue
- Motivation and Emotion
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 279-295
- ISSN
- 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6644
- OpenAlex
- W99431760
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- performance-based rewards, perceived autonomy, perceived competence, intrinsic motivation, cognitive evaluation theory, decision-making autonomy, emotional autonomy, elementary school students, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review