Cited by 123Higher Education Research StudiesEvasion and Academic Success FactorsEducational Outcomes and Influences

The impact of major on college persistence among freshmen

Leppel, Karen·2001·Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1004189906367

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has shown mixed results about differences between undecided and decided students regarding academic achievement.

    “Research has shown mixed results about the differences between undecided and decided students regarding academic achievement (Anderson et al., 1989;Foote, 1980;Leppel, 2001) and persistence (Foote, 1980;Lewallen, 1994;Spight, 2022).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leppel, K.
Affiliations
Widener University (US)
Corresponding author
Leppel, Karen
Venue
Higher Education
Published
2001-04
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
327-342
ISSN
  • 0018-1560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-174X
OpenAlex
W1520417839
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
college persistence, field of study, first-year students, gender differences, business majors, education majors, goal commitment, topic interest, social forces, self-image, student retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review