Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 515

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory

Gibson, Kevin·2000·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1023/a:1006110106408
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1006110106408

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Beauchamp, T.: 1992, Philosophical Ethics(McGraw-Hill, New York).
  2. Bowie, N.: 1996, ‘Relativism, Cultural and Moral’, in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs), pp. 91–95.
  3. Broad, C. D.: 1930, Five Types of Ethical Theory(Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).
  4. Butler, J.: 1950, Five Sermons(Liberal Arts Press, New York).
  5. Carroll, A.: 1993, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management(South-Western Publishing, Cincinnati).
  6. Cottingham, J.: 1991, ‘The Ethics of Self-Concern’, Ethics 101(4) ( July), 798–817. · DOI
  7. Donaldson, T.: 1989, The Ethics of International Business(Oxford University Press, Oxford).
  8. Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T.: 1994, ‘Toward A Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory’, Academy of Management Review 19(2), 252–284. · DOI
  9. Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Evan W. and R. E. Freeman: 1988, ‘A Stakeholder Theory for the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs), pp. 97–106.
  11. Feinberg, J.: 1970, ‘The Nature and Value of Rights’, Journal of Value Inquiry 4, 243-257. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Foot, P. R.: 1958, ‘Moral Beliefs’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59. Reprinted in P. R. Foot: 1967, Theories of Ethics(O.U.P., Oxford). · DOI
  13. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach(Ballinger, Boston).
  14. Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 409–421. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Freeman, R. E.: 1997, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation’, in T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business(Prentice-Hall), pp. 66–76.
  16. French, P.: 1979, ‘The Corporation as a Moral Person’, American Philosophical Quarterly 16(July).
  17. French, P.: 1984, Collective and Corporate Responsibility(Columbia U. Press, New York). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Friedman, Marilyn: 1989, ‘The Impracticality of Impartiality’, Journal of Philosophy. · DOI
  19. Gewirth, A.: 1978, Reason and Morality(University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
  20. Gibson, K.: 1995, ‘Fictitious Persons and Real Responsibilities: Why Corporations Are Responsible For Everything They Do’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 761–767. · DOI
  21. Goodpaster, K. and Matthews, J.: 1982, ‘Can a Corporation Have A Conscience?’ Harvard Business Review(Jan-Feb). Reprinted in T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie: 1988, Ethical Theory and Business(3rd ed.) (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall), pp. 76–86.
  22. Goodpaster, K.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1) (Jan.), 53–74.
  23. Goodpaster, K. and T. Holloran: 1994, ‘In Defense of a Paradox’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (Oct.), 423–429. · DOI
  24. Hill, C. and T. Jones.: 1992, ‘Stakeholder-Agency Theory’, Journal of Management Studies 29(2) (March), 131–154. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kant, I.: 1785, The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals(1785), L. W. Beck (trans.), 1959 (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill).
  26. Kavka, G.: 1984, ‘The Reconciliation Project’, in D. Copp and D. Zimmerman (eds.), Morality, Reason and Truth(Ottowa, Rowman and Allanheld), pp. 297-319.
  27. Primeaux, P. and J. Stieber: 1994, ‘Profit maximization: The Ethical mandate of Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(4) (1994), 287–294. · DOI
  28. Quinn, D. and T. Jones: 1995, ‘An Agent Morality View of Business Policy’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 22–42. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice(Harvard U. Press, Cambridge, Mass). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ross, W. D.: 1930, The Right and the Good(Clarendon Press, Oxford).
  31. Savage, G., R. Nix, C. Whitehead and J. Blair: 1991, ‘Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders’, Academy of Management Executive 5(2) (May), 61–76.
  32. Smith, A.: 1853, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie (eds.) (1976).
  33. Velasquez, M.: 1993, ‘Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do’, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2(Spring). Reprinted in T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.): 1988, Ethical Theory and Business(3rd edition) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs), pp. 69–75.
  34. Weiss, J. W.: 1994, Business Ethics: A Managerial, Stakeholder Approach(Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).
  35. Werhane, P.: 1985, Persons, Rights, and Corporations(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

Cited by

See all 515

Metadata

Authors
Gibson, K.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-08
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
245-257
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1023/a:1006110106408
OpenAlex
W1513233845
Cited by
515
References
1
FWCI
17.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.