The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast-J: Accurate Simulation of In- and Below-Cloud Photolysis in Tropospheric Chemical Models
Open accessAbstract
Photolysis rates in the troposphere are greatly affected by the presenceof cloud and aerosol layers. Yet, the spatial variability of theselayers along with the difficulty of multiple-scattering calculationsfor large particles makes their inclusion in 3-D chemical transportmodels computationally very expensive.This study presents a flexible and accurate photolysis scheme, Fast-J,which calculates photolysis rates in the presence of an arbitrary mix ofcloud and aerosol layers. The algorithm is sufficiently fast to allow thescheme to be incorporated into 3-D global chemical transport models andhave photolysis rates updated hourly. It enables tropospheric chemistrysimulations to include directly the physical properties of the scatteringand absorbing particles in the column, including the full, untruncatedscattering phase function and the total, uncorrected optical depth.The Fast-J scheme is compared with earlier methods that have been usedin 3-D models to parameterize the effects of clouds on photolysis rates.The impact of Fast-J on tropospheric ozone chemistry is demonstratedwith the UCI tropospheric CTM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhancement of atmospheric radiation by an aerosol layer
Michelangeli, D. V., Allen, M., Yung, Y. L., Shia, R., Crisp, D., & Eluszkiewicz, J. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/91jd01308 · Cited by 83
Cited by
Fast, J. D., Gustafson, W. I., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G. A., & Peckham, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006721 · Cited by 1,162
Fu, T., Jacob, D. J., Wittrock, F., Burrows, J. P., Vrekoussis, M., & Henze, D. K. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2007jd009505 · Cited by 746
Appel, K. W., Napelenok, S. L., Foley, K. M., Pye, H. O. T., Hogrefe, C., Luecken, D. J., Bash, J. O., Roselle, S. J., Pleim, J. E., Foroutan, H., et al. (2017) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-10-1703-2017 · Cited by 336
The impact of dust storms on the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea
Jish Prakash, P., Stenchikov, G., Kalenderski, S., Osipov, S., & Bangalath, H. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-199-2015 · Cited by 294
CHIMERE-2017: from urban to hemispheric chemistry-transport modeling
Mailler, S., Menut, L., Khvorostyanov, D., Valari, M., Couvidat, F., Siour, G., Turquety, S., Briant, R., Tuccella, P., Bessagnet, B., et al. (2017) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-10-2397-2017 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Wild, O., Zhu, X., & Prather, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-282
- ISSN
- 0167-7764 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0662
- OpenAlex
- W1486027341
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast-J: Accurate Simulation of In- and Below-Cloud Photolysis in Tropospheric Chemical Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1006415919030
- The paper
- Wild, O., Zhu, X., & Prather, M. J. (2000). Fast-J: Accurate Simulation of In- and Below-Cloud Photolysis in Tropospheric Chemical Models. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1006415919030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
