The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model
Abstract
A new fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model is used to simulate the urban‐ to regional‐scale variations in trace gases, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston over a 5 day summer period. Model performance is evaluated using a wide range of meteorological, chemistry, and particulate measurements obtained during the 2000 Texas Air Quality Study. The predicted trace gas and particulate distributions were qualitatively similar to the surface and aircraft measurements with considerable spatial variations resulting from urban, power plant, and industrial sources of primary pollutants. Sulfate, organic carbon, and other inorganics were the largest constituents of the predicted particulates. The predicted shortwave radiation was 30 to 40 W m −2 closer to the observations when the aerosol optical properties were incorporated into the shortwave radiation scheme; however, the predicted hourly aerosol radiative forcing was still underestimated by 10 to 50 W m −2 . The predicted aerosol radiative forcing was larger over Houston and the industrial ship channel than over the rural areas, consistent with surface measurements. The differences between the observed and simulated aerosol radiative forcing resulted from transport errors, relative humidity errors in the upper convective boundary layer that affect aerosol water content, secondary organic aerosols that were not yet included in the model, and uncertainties in the primary particulate emission rates. The current model was run in a predictive mode and demonstrates the challenges of accurately simulating all of the meteorological, chemical, and aerosol parameters over urban to regional scales that can affect aerosol radiative forcing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
Cooper, R. N., Houghton, J. T., McCarthy, J. J., & Metz, B. (2002) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20033020 · Cited by 12,889
Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W. C., & Eder, B. (2005) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027 · Cited by 3,748
Self-citationNorth American Regional Reanalysis
Mesinger, F., DiMego, G., Kalnay, E., Mitchell, K., Shafran, P. C., Ebisuzaki, W., Jović, D., Woollen, J., Rogers, E., Berbery, E. H., et al. (2006) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-87-3-343 · Cited by 3,378
Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., et al. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005 · Cited by 3,244
Global indirect aerosol effects: a review
Lohmann, U., & Feichter, J. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-715-2005 · Cited by 2,606
Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models
Wesely, M. L. (1989) · Atmospheric Environment (1967) · doi:10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4 · Cited by 2,304
Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations
Kulmala, M., Vehkamäki, H., Petäjä, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Birmili, W., & McMurry, P. H. (2004) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003 · Cited by 2,191
Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review
Haywood, J., & Boucher, O. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg000078 · Cited by 2,097
WESELY, M. (2007) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.058 · Cited by 1,873
Ricchiazzi, P., Yang, S., Gautier, C., & Sowle, D. (1998) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<2101:sarats>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,578
Cited by
Monks, S. A., Arnold, S. R., Emmons, L. K., Law, K. S., Turquety, S., Duncan, B. N., Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Tilmes, S., Langner, J., et al. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-3575-2015 · Cited by 106
Marelle, L., Thomas, J. L., Raut, J.-C., Law, K. S., Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L., Roiger, A., Schlager, H., Kim, J., Reiter, A., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-2359-2016 · Cited by 92
Trifluoroacetic acid deposition from emissions of HFO-1234yf in India, China, and the Middle East
David, L. M., Barth, M., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Purohit, P., Velders, G. J. M., Glaser, S., & Ravishankara, A. R. (2021) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-21-14833-2021 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Fast, J. D., Gustafson, W. I., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G. A., & Peckham, S. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2006-11-11
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- D21
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092866358
- Cited by
- 1,162
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2005jd006721
- The paper
- Fast, J. D., Gustafson, W. I., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G. A., & Peckham, S. E. (2006). Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
