Cited by 266Origins and Evolution of LifePhilosophy and History of ScienceSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life

About Various Definitions of Life

Luisi, Pier Luigi·1998·Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere

Abstract

The old question of a definition of minimal life is taken up again at the aim of providing a forum for an updated discussion. Briefly discussed are the reasons why such an attempt has previously encountered scepticism, and why such an attempt should be renewed at this stage of the inquiry on the origin of life. Then some of the definitions of life presently used are cited and briefly discussed, starting with the definition adopted by NASA as a general working definition. It is shown that this is too limited if one wishes to provide a broad encompassing definition, and some extensions of it are presented and discussed. Finally it is shown how the different definitions of life reflect the main schools of thought that presently dominate the field on the origin of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1006517315105

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our current understanding of life's origin suggests that there were intermediate states through which all forms of life must emerge.

    “Our current understanding of life's origin suggests that there were intermediate states through which all forms of life must emerge (Fry, 1995; Luisi, 1998; Perry and Kolb, 2004).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Luisi, 1998

  • The Joyce (1994) definition gives a useful way to identify candidate life-forms but requires that the life-form be verified by clear evidence of evolution.

    “But while the Joyce (1994) definition gives us a useful way to identify candidate life-forms, it also requires that the life-form be verified by no less than clear evidence of evolution (Luisi, 1998; Cleland and Chyba, 2002).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Luisi, 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luisi, P. L.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Luisi, Pier Luigi
Venue
Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere
Published
1998-10
Volume
28
Issue
4-6
Pages
613-622
ISSN
  • 0169-6149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0875
OpenAlex
W2144406157
Cited by
266
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Keywords
concept of life, origin of life, philosophy of biology
MeSH terms
Origin of Life, Biological Evolution, Models, Biological, Philosophy, United States, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Exobiology, Life, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review