Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 717

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review and Empirical Evaluation of Feature Weighting Methods for a Class of Lazy Learning Algorithms

Wettschereck, Dietrich, Aha, David W., Mohri, Takao·1997·Artificial Intelligence Review

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1006593614256

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 87 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Ashley, K. D. & Rissland, E. L. (1988). Waiting on weighting: A symbolic least commitment approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 239–244. St. Paul, MN: Morgan Kaufmann.
  2. Atkeson, C. (1989). Using local models to control movement. In D. S. Touretzky (ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  3. Bareiss, R. (1989). The experimental evaluation of a case-based learning apprentice. In Proceedings of a Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, pp. 162–167. Pensacola Beach, FL: Morgan Kaufmann.
  4. Broomhead, D. S. & Lowe, D. (1988). Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Systems 2: 321–355.
  5. Cain, T., Pazzani, M. J. & Silverstein, G. (1991). Using domain knowledge to influence similarity judgement. In Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, pp. 191–202. Washington, DC: Morgan Kaufmann.
  6. Connell, M. E. & Utgoff, P. E. (1987). Learning to control a dynamic physical system. In Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 456–460. Seattle, WA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  7. Daelemans, W., Gills, S. & Durieux, G. (1993). Learnability and markedness in data-driven acquisition of stress (Technical Report 43). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University, Institute for Language Technology and Artificial Intelligence.
  8. Daelemans, W., van den Bosch, A. (1992). Generalization performance of backpropagation learning on a syllabification task. In Proceedings of TWLT3: Connectionism and Natural Language Processing, pp. 27–37. Enschede, The Netherlands: Unpublished.
  9. Doak, J. (1992). An evaluation of feature selection methods and their application to computer security (Technical Report CSE–92–18). Davis, CA: University of California, Department of Computer Science.
  10. Fukunaga, K. & Flick, T. (1982). A parametrically-defined nearest neighbor distance measure. Pattern Recognition Letters 1: 3–5. · doi:10.1016/0167-8655(82)90043-5
  11. Hayashi, C. (1952). On the prediction of phenomena from qualitative data and the quantification of qualitative data from the mathematical-statistical point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 3: 69–98. · doi:10.1007/bf02949778
  12. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  13. Kshirsager, A. (1972). Multivariate Analysis. New York: Dekker.
  14. Ling, X. C. & Wang, H. (1996). Towards optimal weights setting for the 1-nearest neighbour learning algorithm. Artificial Intelligence Review, this issue.
  15. Mohri, T., Nakamura, M. & Tanaka, H. (1993). Weather forecasting using memory-based reasoning. In Second International Workshop on Parallel Processing for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 40–45. · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-81837-9.50019-1
  16. Mohri, T. & Tanaka, H. (1995). Comparison between attribute weighting methods in memory-based reasoning and multivariate analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication. · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-81837-9.50019-1
  17. Satoh, K. & Okamoto, S. (1994). Toward PAC-learning of weights from qualitative distance information. In D. W. Aha (ed.) Case-Based Reasoning: Papers from the 1994 Workshop (Technical Report WS–94–01). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
  18. Short, R. & Fukunaga, K. (1980). A new nearest neighbor distance measure. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 81–86. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
  19. Skalak, D. (1992). Representing cases as knowledge sources that apply local similarity metrics. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 325–330. Bloomington, IN: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  20. Ting, K. M. (1994). Discretization of continuous-valued attributes and instance-based learning (Technical Report). Sydney, Australia, University of Sydney, Basser Department of Computer Science.
  21. van den Bosch, A. & Daelemans, W. (1993). Data-oriented methods for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion (Technical Report 42). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University, Institute for Language Technology and Artificial Intelligence.
  22. Wettschereck, D. (1995a). A description of the mutual information approach and the variable similiarty metric (Technical Report 944). Sankt Augustin, Germany, German National Research Center for Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence Research Division.
  23. Wettschereck, D. (1995b). Weighted kNN versus majority kNN: A recommendation (Technical Report 943). Sankt Augustin, Germany, German National Research Center for Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence Research Division.
  24. Wettschereck, D. & Dietterich, T. G. (1995). An experimental comparison of the nearest neighbor and nearest hyperrectangle algorithms. Machine Learning 19: 5–28.
  25. Yau, H. C. & Manry, M. T. (1991). Iterative improvement of a nearest neighbor classifier. Neural Networks 4: 517–524. · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(91)90048-a
  26. Zhang, J. (1990). A method that combines inductive learning with exemplar-based learning. In Proceedings for Tools for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 31–37. Herndon, VA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

Cited by

See all 717

Metadata

Authors
Wettschereck, D., Aha, D. W., & Mohri, T.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
1997-02
Volume
11
Issue
1-5
Pages
273-314
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W1827261456
Cited by
717
References
87
FWCI
33.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review and Empirical Evaluation of Feature Weighting Methods for a Class of Lazy Learning Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1006593614256
The paper
Wettschereck, D., Aha, D. W., & Mohri, T. (1997). A Review and Empirical Evaluation of Feature Weighting Methods for a Class of Lazy Learning Algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1006593614256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.