Cited by 142Philosophy and History of ScienceEvolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolution and Science Education

The Replicator in Retrospect

Godfrey-Smith, Peter·2000·Biology and Philosophy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1006704301415

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evolution without replicators applies even to genetic evolution.

    “The concept of “evolution without replicators” applies even to genetic evolution (Godfrey-Smith 2000).”

    From Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change (2014) · cites this paper as Godfrey-Smith 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godfrey-Smith, P.
Venue
Biology and Philosophy
Published
2000-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
403-423
ISSN
  • 0169-3867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8404
OpenAlex
W1602131724
Cited by
142
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biology & Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
Richard Dawkins, natural selection, evolutionary theory, history of evolutionary theory, philosophy of biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review