The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“people with initial negative attitudes toward GMOs were more accepting of proposed GMO applications if the information contained statements about scientists' uncertainty (Frewer, Howard, and Shepherd, 1998).”
From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Frewer, Howard, and Shepherd, 1998
Citations
Cites
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Perceived risk, trust, and democracy
Slovic, P. (1993) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x · Cited by 1,946
Attribution in social interaction.
Kelley, H. H. (1987) · Cited by 1,258
What Determines Trust in Information About Food‐Related Risks? Underlying Psychological Constructs
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., HEDDERLEY, D. I., & Shepherd, R. (1996) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01094.x · Cited by 677
Self-citationSelf-Generated Attitude Change
Tesser, A. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60010-6 · Cited by 665
Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.424 · Cited by 633
Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks
Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. P. (1992) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x · Cited by 518
Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe
Joss, S., & Durant, J. (1995) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 503
Johnson, B. B., & Slovic, P. (1995) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00341.x · Cited by 374
Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology
Otway, H. J., Cannell, W., Kates, R. W., Hohenemser, C., & Kasperson, J. X. (1987) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143853 · Cited by 352
SPARKS, P. B., & Shepherd, R. (1994) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00291.x · Cited by 347
Self-citationFrewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399702200105 · Cited by 325
Self-citationFrewer, L. J., Shepherd, R., & SPARKS, P. B. (1994) · Journal of Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1745-4565.1994.tb00581.x · Cited by 265
Self-citationGene technology, food production, and public opinion: a UK study
Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. J. (1994) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/bf01534445 · Cited by 142
Self-citationThe influence of realistic product exposure on attitudes towards genetic engineering of food
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1996) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/0950-3293(95)00017-8 · Cited by 140
Self-citationAffective-cognitive consistency and thought-induced attitude polarization.
Chaiken, S., & Yates, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.49.6.1470 · Cited by 134
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., HEDDERLEY, D. I., & Shepherd, R. (1999) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/8/1/003 · Cited by 130
Self-citationWhat the Public Thinks About Biotechnology
Zechendorf, B. (1994) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0994-870 · Cited by 128
Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view.
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.401 · Cited by 121
Biotechnology and Food Production
Frewer, L. J., Shepherd, R., & SPARKS, P. B. (1994) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070709410072562 · Cited by 100
Self-citation‘Objection’ mapping in determining group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering
Frewer, L. J., HEDDERLEY, D. I., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1023/a:1007331524432 · Cited by 91
Self-citationFrewer, L. J., & Shepherd, R. (1994) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/3/4/003 · Cited by 75
Self-citationEffective communication about genetic engineering and food
Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1996) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070709610119883 · Cited by 46
Self-citationModelling the media: the transmission of risk information in the British quality press
Frewer, L. J., Raats, M. M., & Shepherd, R. (1993) · IMA Journal of Management Mathematics · doi:10.1093/imaman/5.1.235 · Cited by 33
Self-citationTesting the Role of Technical Information in Public Risk Perception
Johnson, B. B., Sandman, P. M., & Miller, P. (1992) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · Cited by 22
Integration and attribution theories in personality impression formation.
Himmelfarb, S. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033126 · Cited by 22
Reiser, J., & Käppeli, O. (1989) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01950150 · Cited by 16
Touraine, A. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563706.003 · Cited by 14
Biotechnology's issue of public credibility
Rothenberg, L. (1994) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/0167-7799(94)90017-5 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Eagly, A. H., and S. Chaiken. (1993), “Process theories of attitude formation and change: Attribution approaches and social judgment theory,” in A. H. Eagly and S. Chaiken (eds.), The Psychology of Attitudes(pp. 351–388). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Doble, J. (1996), “Productive policy depends on public's understanding of scientific issues,” The Scientist10: 9.
- Habict, F. H. (1992), Guidance on Risk Characterization for Risk Managers and Risk Assessors. Washington, DC: Office of the Administrator, US Environmental Protection Agency.
- Heijs, W. J. M., C. J. H. Midden, and R. A. J. Drabbe (1993), Biotechnology: Attitudes and Influencing Factors. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.
- Heller, A. (1988), General Ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell: 73.
- Office of Science and Technology (1995), Technology Foresight: Progress through Partnership. No 7. Food and Drink. London: HMSO.
- Shamos, M. H. (1991), “Scientific literacy: Can it decrease public anxiety about science and technology?” in D. J. Roy, B. E. Wynne, and R. W. Old. (eds.), Bioscience Society. London: Wiley.
- Sherif, M., and C. W. Sherif (1967), “Attitude as the individual's own categories: The social judgmentinvolvement approach to attitude and attitude change,” in C. W. Sherif and M. Sherif (eds.), Attitude, Ego Involvement and Change(pp. 105–139). New York: Wiley.
- Smink, G. C. J., and A. M. Hamstra (1996), Informing Consumers About Foodstuffs Made With Genetic Engineering: A Constructive Contribution To The Issue. Leiden: SWOKA Instituut voor Consumentenenonderzoek.
- Tesser, A. (1978), “Selfgenerated attitude change,” in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 11(pp. 289–338). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224390002500101 · Cited by 2,246
Self-citationBeyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks
Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L. J., Robinson, P., & Sandøe, P. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00079-5 · Cited by 547
Self-citationTrust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food?
Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2005) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x · Cited by 376
Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics
Ronteltap, A., van Trijp, J. C. M., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2007) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.002 · Cited by 377
Self-citationGeneral and microbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation
Raimbault, M. (1998) · Electronic Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.2225/vol1-issue3-fulltext-9 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R.
- Affiliations
- Quadram Institute (GB)
- Venue
- Agriculture and Human Values
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-30
- ISSN
- 0889-048X (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8366
- OpenAlex
- W1578977344
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 16.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agriculture and Human Values (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Office of Science
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
- Keywords
- genetic engineering, genetically modified foods, public attitudes, source credibility, risk and uncertainty, persuasive messages, social judgment theory, elaborative processing, information quality, technology acceptance, science communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
