Cited by 372Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer survivorship and careOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse

Open access
Brada, M., Hoang-Xuan, K., Rampling, R., Dietrich, P.-Y., Dirix, L.Y., Macdonald, D., Heimans, J.J., Zonnenberg, B.A. +8 more·2001·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is resistant to most therapeutic endeavors, with low response rates and survival rarely exceeding six months. There are no clearly established chemotherapeutic regimens and the aim of treatment is palliation with improvement in the quality of life.Patients and methods We report an open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in 138 patients (intent-to-treat [ITT] population) with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 70. One hundred twenty-eight patients were histologically confirmed with GBM or gliosarcoma (GS) by independent central review. Chemotherapy-naïve patients were treated with temozolomide 200 mg/m2/day orally for the first five days of a 28-day cycle. Patients previously treated with nitrosourea-containing adjuvant chemotherapy received 150 mg/m2/day for the first five days of a 28-day cycle. In the absence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity, patients on the 150 mg/m2 dose schedule were eligible for a 200 mg/m2 dose on the next cycle.Results The primary endpoint was six-month progression-free survival assessed with strict radiological and clinical criteria. Secondary endpoints included radiological response and Health-related Quality of Life (HQL). Progression-free survival at six months was 18% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11%-26%) for the eligible-histology population. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 2.1 months and 5.4 months, respectively. The six-month survival rate was 46%. The objective response rate (complete response and partial response) determined by independent central review of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was 8% for both the ITT and eligible-histology populations, with an additional 43% and 45% of patients, respectively, having stable disease (SD). Objectively assessed response and maintenance of a progression-free status were both associated with HQL benefits (characterized by improvements over baseline in HQL domains). Temozolomide had an acceptable safety profile, with only 9% of therapy cycles requiring a dose reduction due to thrombocytopenia. There was no evidence of cumulative hematologic toxicity.Conclusions Temozolomide demonstrated modest clinical efficacy, with an acceptable safety profile and measurable improvement in quality of life in patients with recurrent GBM. The use of this drug should be explored further in an adjuvant setting and in combination with other agents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1008382516636

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brada, M., Hoang-Xuan, K., Rampling, R., Dietrich, P.-Y., Dirix, L. Y., Macdonald, D., Heimans, J. J., Zonnenberg, B. A., Bravo-Marques, J. M., Henriksson, R., Stupp, R., Yue, N., Bruner, J., Dugan, M., Rao, S., & Zaknoen, S.
Affiliations
  • Royal Marsden Hospital (GB)
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil (PT)
  • University Hospital of Umeå (SE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
259-266
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125643269
Cited by
372
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
temozolomide, recurrent glioblastoma, first relapse, gliosarcoma, progression-free survival, objective response rate, health-related quality of life, thrombocytopenia, chemotherapy toxicity, dose escalation, palliative care, overall survival, Karnofsky performance status
MeSH terms
Temozolomide, Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Dacarbazine, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Disease-Free Survival, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review