Cited by 153Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime Patterns and Interventions

Gambling and correlates of gambling among Minnesota public school students

Stinchfield, Randy·2000·Journal of Gambling Studies

Abstract

This study examines the prevalence of gambling and measures the relationships between gambling behavior and a number of demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral variables among Minnesota public school students. The sample includes 78,582 male and female Minnesota public school students enrolled in the 9th and 12th grades. Students were administered the 1998 Minnesota Student Survey, a 121-item, anonymous, self-administered, paper-and-pencil questionnaire that inquires about multiple health-related content domains, including gambling behavior. The majority of students were found to have gambled at least once during the past year, however, most students did not report gambling frequently, nor did they report problems associated with their gambling. Boys reported gambling more often than girls, and older students gambled more often than younger students. A larger percentage of Mexican/Latin American, African American, American Indian, and mixed race students gambled at weekly and daily rates than Asian American and Caucasian students. Variables associated with gambling frequency included antisocial behavior, gender (being a male), alcohol and tobacco use, age, feeling bad about the amount of money they bet, a desire to stop gambling, and increased sexual activity. Gambling appears to be related to other risk-taking behaviors and may be a part of the adolescent experimentation with adult behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1009428913972

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problem gambling behaviour is part of a constellation of other antisocial, risk-taking, violent, and delinquent behaviours in adolescence, particularly for males.

    “Taken together, these findings are consistent with previous cross-sectional research that suggests that problem gambling behaviour is part of a constellation of other antisocial, risk-taking, violent, and delinquent behaviours in adolescence, particularly for males (Jacobs, 2000;Stinchfield, 2000;Vitaro et al., 2001).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 153

Authors
Stinchfield, R.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Stinchfield, Randy
Venue
Journal of Gambling Studies
Published
2000-09
Volume
16
Issue
2-3
Pages
153-173
ISSN
  • 1050-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3602
OpenAlex
W33170536
Cited by
153
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gambling Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
gambling, youth gambling, high school students, gambling prevalence, gambling frequency, gender differences, racial and ethnic differences, antisocial behavior, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, sexual activity, risk-taking, Minnesota Student Survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review