Cited by 196Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

Global Warming Potential of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Biomass Stored in the Anthroposphere and Used for Bioenergy at End of Life

Guest, Geoffrey, Cherubini, Francesco, Strømman, Anders H.·2013·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: There is growing interest in understanding how storage or delayed emission of carbon in products based on bioresources might mitigate climate change, and how such activities could be credited. In this research we extend the recently introduced approach that integrates biogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) fluxes with the global carbon cycle (using biogenic global warming potential [GWP bio ]) to consider the storage period of harvested biomass in the anthroposphere, with subsequent oxidation. We then examine how this affects the climate impact from a bioenergy resource. This approach is compared to several recent methods designed to address the same problem. Using both a 100‐ and a 500‐year fixed time horizon we calculate the GWP bio factor for every combination of rotational and anthropogenic storage periods between 0 and 100 years. The resulting GWP bio factors range from −0.99 (1‐year rotation and 100‐year storage) to +0.44 (100‐year rotation and 0‐year storage). The approach proposed in this study includes the interface between biomass growth and emissions and the global carbon cycle, whereas other methods do not model this. These results and the characterization factors produced can determine the climate change benefits or impacts associated with the storage of biomass in the anthroposphere, and the subsequent release of biogenic CO 2 with the radiative forcing integrated in a fixed time window.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00507.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guest et al. (2013a) expanded GWPbio to include the effect of delayed emissions and storage, resulting in GWPbio factors specific to rotation period and storage duration.

    “Guest et al. (2013a) expanded the GWPbio to include the effect of delayed emissions and storage, resulting in GWPbio factors specific to the rotation period and storage duration.”

    From Balancing the green carbon cycle — Biogenic carbon within life cycle assessment (2025) · cites this paper as Guest et al. (2013a)

  • Guest et al. (2013b) argue that GWPbio factors for collected forest residues should be the same as for primary biomass.

    “Guest et al. (2013b) consider the role of forest residues for GWPbio factors but argue the GWPbio factors for collected residues should be the same as for primary biomass.”

    From Balancing the green carbon cycle — Biogenic carbon within life cycle assessment (2025) · cites this paper as Guest et al. (2013b)

  • Guest et al. (2013b) expanded the GWPbio concept to include harvest residues left to decay.

    “Guest et al. (2013b) expanded the GWPbio concept to include harvest residues left to decay.”

    From Balancing the green carbon cycle — Biogenic carbon within life cycle assessment (2025) · cites this paper as Guest et al. (2013b)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guest, G., Cherubini, F., & Strømman, A. H.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Guest, Geoffrey
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
20-30
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W2171121540
Cited by
193
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norwegian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
global warming potential, biomass storage, bioenergy, carbon sequestration, carbon cycle, radiative forcing, climate change mitigation, characterization factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review