Cited by 16Wood Treatment and PropertiesNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesGeophysical Methods and Applications

Subsurface Sensing of Properties and Defects in Wood and Wood Products

Beall, Frank C.·2000·Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1010135009428

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beall, F. C.
Corresponding author
Beall, Frank C.
Venue
Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications
Published
2000-04
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
181-204
ISSN
  • 1566-0184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9317
OpenAlex
W164218996
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysical Methods and Applications
Keywords
subsurface sensing, wood, wood products, non-destructive testing, moisture content, density, grain orientation, mechanical properties, internal defects, growth defects, processing defects, adhesive bonding, bond quality, bond formation, strength prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review