Post-boom logging in Amazonia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A number of longitudinal case studies of Amazonian communities provide evidence not of boom-bust cycles, but instead of stable or continuing welfare improvements over time.
“a number of case studies (for example Sears et al. 2007, Piñedo-Vasquez et al. 2001, Guedes et al. 2012, Hall and Caviglia-Harris 2013, Mangabeira 2010) that have examined the dynamic trajectories of different Amazonian communities for between 7 to 22 years provide evidence not of boom-bust cycles, but instead either stable or continuing welfare improvements over time.”
From Boom-bust patterns in the Brazilian Amazon (2015) · cites this paper as Piñedo-Vasquez et al. 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boom-bust patterns in the Brazilian Amazon
Weinhold, D., Reis, E. J., & Vale, P. M. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.013 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Scherr, S. J. (2004) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1023/b:agfo.0000029010.97567.2b · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Zarin, D. J., Coffey, K., Padoch, C., & Rabelo, F.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- New York Botanical Garden (US)
- Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Pinedo-Vasquez, Miguel
- Venue
- Human Ecology
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-239
- ISSN
- 0300-7839 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9915
- OpenAlex
- W1567711487
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- smallholder forestry, agroforestry, sawtimber, firewood, smallholder income, Amazon basin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review