Cited by 71Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionCultural Differences and ValuesTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Globalization, culture, and anxiety: perspectives and predictions from terror management theory

Salzman, Michael B.·2001·Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless

Abstract

This paper considers the psychological and social consequences of an ascendant global capitalism and its resultant cultural impositions from the perspective of current social psychology theory. Terror Management Theory (TMT) suggests that culture serves as a psychological defense against the terror inherent in human existence. TMT proposes that cultures serve the vital psychological function of making anxiety-buffering self-esteem available to humans by providing world-views and standards of value to achieve within that description of reality. Persons whose faith in that world-view is strong and who see themselves as living up to its standards of value achieve the anxiety-buffering effects of self-esteem needed in an existentially terrifying world. Because a hegemonic global capitalism and its cultural impositions guarantee that in a cultural meaning system that affords anxiety-buffe ring self-esteem to only the “winners” of the great competition, most people will perceive themselves as “losers.” TMT predicts increased anxiety and social distress because a global capitalist system and culture will offer psychological sustenance to a minority of the world’s people. This paper will review the theory, its empirical supports, and offer a set of hypotheses derived from the predictable psychological, social, and behavioral consequences of a global capitalist system and culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1011676025600

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When cultural trauma damages a group's cultural modes, healthy functioning can be disrupted because modes protect against stress and anxiety, promote self-regulation, and facilitate adaptation to external stressors.

    “When cultural trauma damages a group’s cultural modes, psychological studies have shown that healthy functioning can be disrupted as modes serve crucial psychological functions including protecting against stress and anxiety, promoting self-regulation, and facilitating effective adaptation/response to external stressors (Markus and Kitayama, 2010; Norris et al., 2002; Salzman, 2001; Savickas, 2005”

    From Cultural trauma as a fundamental cause of health disparities (2022) · cites this paper as Salzman, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salzman, M. B.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Salzman, Michael B.
Venue
Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless
Published
2001-01
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
337-352
ISSN
  • 1053-0789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-658X
OpenAlex
W160054481
Cited by
71
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
terror management theory, globalization, global capitalism, cultural anxiety, self-esteem, social distress, cultural hegemony, social inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review