Cited by 24Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesTree-ring climate responses

Five centuries of changing forest vegetation in the Northeastern United States

Russell, Emily W.B., Davis, Ronald B.·2001·Plant Ecology

Abstract

Maps of physiognomic classes of vegetation in the northeastern UnitedStates before European human impact and for the late 20th century, based onpollen data, closely resemble each other, indicating a robust pattern in theface of the novel and extensive disturbances of the last 500 years. On the otherhand, species abundances have changed considerably, with today's vegetationhaving less Fagus L. and TsugaCarrière and more Betula L.,Picea A. Dietr., and Abies Miller.Picea and Castanea Miller increasedfrom 1700 to 1900, but have decreased in this century. The difference betweenthe main physiognomic classes has remained strong, however, with continuouslymore Picea, Abies andBetula in the north and more QuercusL. and Carya Nutt. in the south, indicating the dominanceof climate in regulating the relative abundances of these genera. Thevegetational patterning within these broad classes has changed in some placesand remained stable in others, suggesting differences in local factors thatdetermine relative species abundances. The influence of slight altitudinalgradients, for example, may influence forest composition only after severalgenerations of trees, while substrate differences may be apparent in the firstforest that regenerates after agricultural abandonment or logging. Forests oftoday, therefore, reflect complex interactions of disturbance and environment,and may be in equilibrium with some but not all features of their currentenvironments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1013252117853

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bradley R.W. and Jones P.D. 1995. Recent developments in studies of climate since A.D. 1500. In: Bradley R.W. and Jones P.D. (eds.), Climate Since 1500. 2nd edn., Routledge, pp. 666–679.
  2. Elias T.S. 1990. The Complete Trees of North America. Gramercy, New York.
  3. Federal Geographic Data Committee Vegetation Subcommittee 1996. FGDC Vegetation Classification and Information Standards. Federal Geographic Data Committee Secretariat, Reston, VA, USA.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Russell, E. W. B., & Davis, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Maine (US)
Venue
Plant Ecology
Published
2001-07
Volume
155
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 1385-0237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5052
OpenAlex
W2150117663
Cited by
24
References
58
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
Keywords
forest vegetation change, pollen analysis, species abundance, Fagus, hemlock, Betula, Picea, Abies, oak, hickory, disturbance, agricultural abandonment, logging, forest regeneration, elevation gradient, substrate effects, northeastern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review