Reconciliation in captive chimpanzees: A reevaluation with controlled methods
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The matched control design controlled for changes in the birds' behavior expected throughout the day, isolating changes due to encounters.
“By employing this powerful “matched control” design [17,18,19], we controlled for changes in the birds’ behavior that would be expected throughout the day, due to factors such as fixed feeding times, to isolate changes due to the encounters themselves.”
From Evaluating the Behavior and Temperament of African Penguins in a Non-Contact Animal Encounter Program (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest: Behavioural Ecology and Evolution
Boesch, C., & Boesch-Achermann, H. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505082.001.0001 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Receiving Post-Conflict Affiliation from the Enemy's Friend Reconciles Former Opponents
Wittig, R. M., & Boesch, C. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013995 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Saiyed, S. T., Hopper, L. M., & Cronin, K. A. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060326 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Preuschoft, S., Wang, X., Aureli, F., & de Waal, F. B. M.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Preuschoft, Signe
- Venue
- International Journal of Primatology
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-50
- ISSN
- 0164-0291 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8604
- OpenAlex
- W2100918881
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Primatology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- reconciliation, chimpanzees, grooming, social behavior, age and sex differences, captive primates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
