Intercultural marriage and intimacy: Beyond the continental divide
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When negative attitudes and reactions come from extended families and friends, they can be even more severe because of closeness of relationships.
“When such attitudes and reactions are from extended families and friends, they can be even more severe because of the closeness of relationships (Bystydzienski, 2011;Mcfadden & Moore, 2001;Rosenblatt, 2009).”
From Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families (2017) · cites this paper as Mcfadden & Moore, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families
Xiang, Y., Hoot, J., & Raisor, J. (2017) · Journal of Family Diversity in Education · doi:10.53956/jfde.2017.103 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mcfadden, J., & Moore, J. L.
- Venue
- International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 261-268
- ISSN
- 0165-0653 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3246
- OpenAlex
- W154903721
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- intercultural marriage, intimacy, cross-cultural relationships, mate choice, ethnic identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review