Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Friendship Networks and Delinquency: The Relative Nature of Peer Delinquency

Haynie, Dana L.·2002·Journal of Quantitative Criminology
DOI 10.1023/a:1015227414929
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015227414929

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Haynie, D. L.
Venue
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
99-134
ISSN
  • 0748-4518 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7799
DOI
10.1023/a:1015227414929
OpenAlex
W1534878391
Cited by
489
References
74
FWCI
28.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Friendship Networks and Delinquency: The Relative Nature of Peer Delinquency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1015227414929
The paper
Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship Networks and Delinquency: The Relative Nature of Peer Delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1015227414929

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.