Co-Offending and the Age-Crime Curve
Abstract
It is proffered rather frequently that co-offending is the dominate form of criminal offending among juveniles because of the enhanced salience of peer pressure during adolescence, and that this enhanced propensity to co-offend is pivotal for understanding the age-crime curve. Using National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data for 2002, the authors conduct an analysis of 466,311 criminal arrests drawn from seven states. Their findings indicate that co-offending patterns by age are not noteworthy in elucidating why participation in illegal activities rises in adolescence, peaks in early adulthood, and then declines thereafter. Once co-offending is differentiated from solo offending, with solo offending representing the bulk of criminal activity among all age groups, including juveniles, a curvilinear relationship remains between age and solo-offending and between age and co-offending. These nonlinear associations are not conditioned by an offender's sex, race, or by offense type. The authors also analyzed co-offending crimes reported to police. In many types of crimes, offenders and victims come into contact, thus allowing for the estimation of the perpetrator's age notwithstanding whether an arrest was made. The findings generated in this supplemental analysis are similar to those produced using the arrest data. The results of this study have consequential theoretical implications not only because they cast doubt on the assertion that differences in co-offending levels between juveniles and adults account for the age-crime curve, but they also contravene the widely held belief that most juvenile offenses are perpetrated in the company of others rather than by individuals acting alone. Based on the new data reported here it appears that group offending is merely incidental in circumstance and thus of little etiological significance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127 · see citing works
Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct
Warr, M. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803956 · Cited by 1,122 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
‘I Wasn't Alone’: Collective Behaviour and Violent Delinquency
McGloin, J. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2009) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1375/acri.42.3.336 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Deciding in the dark: Age differences in intuitive risk judgment.
Shulman, E. P., & Cauffman, E. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032778 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The Compounding Effect: How Co-Offending Exacerbates the Harm Caused by Violent Offenders
Piper, E., Ariel, B., Harinam, V., & Bland, M. (2024) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-024-09765-9 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stolzenberg, L., & D'Alessio, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- Florida International University
- ORCID
- Stolzenberg, Lisa
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-86
- ISSN
- 0022-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-731X
- OpenAlex
- W2105493309
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 30.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Keywords
- co-offending, age-crime curve, juvenile delinquency, group offending, peer pressure, adolescence, criminal arrest, National Incident-Based Reporting System, age of offenders, victim-offender overlap
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review