CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 304Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthDisaster Management and Resilience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coping self-efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long-term distress following natural disasters

Benight, Charles C., Harper, Michelle L.·2002·Journal of Traumatic Stress
DOI 10.1023/a:1015295025950
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The mediating effect of coping self‐efficacy (CSE) perceptions between acute stress responses (ASR) and 1 ‐year distress following two disasters was tested. Between 3 and 8 weeks after the second disaster and again at 1 year, 46 residents completed questionnaires. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms and global distress served as outcomes. Multiple regression demonstrated that ASR and Time 1 CSE were significant predictors of both Time 1 outcomes. Time 1 PTSD symptoms and Time 2 CSE were significant factors for Time 2 PTSD symptoms. Gender was significant for Time 2 PTSD symptoms, but not for Time 2 global distress. Longitudinally. Time 1 CSE predicted Time 2 PTSD symptoms, but not general distress. CSE mediated between ASR and both psychological outcomes at Time 2. Coping self‐efficacy perceptions provide a possible intervention target.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015295025950

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bandura A., 1997, Self‐efficacy and agency of change
  2. Derogatis L. R., 1983, The SCL‐90‐R Manual: Scoring, administration, and procedures for the SCL‐90‐R
  3. 10.1002/jts.2490080103 · DOI
  4. Marmar C. R., 1998, Trauma, memory, and dissociation. Progress in psychiatry, 229
  5. 10.1002/jts.2490090107 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–304 of 304

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Benight, C. C., & Harper, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Corresponding author
Benight, Charles C.
ORCID
Benight, Charles C.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
177-186
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
DOI
10.1023/a:1015295025950
OpenAlex
W2096053457
Cited by
304
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1125 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
coping self-efficacy, acute stress response, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, natural disasters, disaster survivors, mediation, gender differences, intervention targets
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adaptation, Psychological, Chronic Disease, Colorado, Disasters, Female, Fires, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review