Cited by 183Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Effect of crop-specific field management and N fertilization on N2O emissions from a fine-loamy soil

Ruser, R., Flessa, H., Schilling, R., Beese, F., Munch, J.C.·2001·Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

Abstract

Agricultural soils are a major source of atmospheric N2O. This study was conducted to determine the effect of different crop-specific field management and N fertilization rates on N2O emissions from a fine-loamy Dystric Eutrochrept. Fluxes of N2O were measured for two years at least once a week on plots cropped with potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) fertilized with 50 or 150 kg N ha(-1) a(-1), winterwheat (Triticum aestivum) fertilized with 90 or 180 kg N ha(-1) a(-1), corn (Zea mays) fertilized with 65 or 130 kg N ha(-1) a(-1), and on an unfertilized, set-aside soil planted with grass (mainly Lolium perenne and Festuca rubra). The mean N2O emission rate from the differently managed plots was closely correlated to the mean soil nitrate content in the Ap horizon for the cropping period (April to October, r(2) = 0.74), the winter period (November to March, r(2) = 0.93, one outlier excluded), and the whole year (r(2) = 0.81). N2O emissions outside the cropping period accounted for up to 58% of the annual emissions and were strongly affected by frost-thaw cycles. There was only a slight relationship between the amount of fertilizer N applied and the annual N2O emission (r(2) = 0.20). The mean annual N2O-N emission from the unfertilized set-aside soil was 0.29 kg ha(-1) The annual N2O-N emission from the fertilized crops for the low and the recommended rates of N fertilization were 1.34 and 2.41 kg ha(-1) for corn, 2.70 and 3.64 kg ha(- 1) for wheat, and 5.74 and 6.93 kg ha(-1) for pot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1017512205888

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • N2O production processes are controlled by soil management, such as fertilization and tillage, and abiotic factors such as climate, frost and thaw frequency, soil porosity, moisture content, pH and organic C availability.

    “These processes are controlled by soil management, such as fertilization and tillage, and abiotic factors such as climate, frost and thaw frequency, soil porosity, moisture content, pH and organic C availability (e.g., Skiba & Smith, 2000;Ruser et al., 2001;Jungkunst et al., 2006;Stehfest & Bouwman, 2006).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruser, R., Flessa, H., Schilling, R., Beese, F., & Munch, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Ruser, R.
Venue
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Published
2001-03
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
177-191
ISSN
  • 1385-1314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0867
OpenAlex
W1272062140
Cited by
183
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
nitrous oxide emissions, nitrogen fertilization, soil nitrate, potato, winter wheat, maize, freeze-thaw cycles, greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review