The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems
West, C. K., & Gibson, J. J. (1969) · Journal of Aesthetic Education · doi:10.2307/3331482 · Cited by 6,336
The Integrative Action of the Nervous System.
Sherrington, C. (1907) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-190734120-00021 · Cited by 4,136
(1999) · Cited by 2,243
Treatise on Physiological Optics
von Helmholtz, H., & Southall, P. C. (1962) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,196
Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-11-03416.1987 · Cited by 1,758
Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field”
Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. (1993) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90156-q · Cited by 1,614
Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects
Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8 · Cited by 1,357
Wheatstone, C. (1838) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1838.0019 · Cited by 1,320
Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex
Bosking, W. H., Zhang, Y., Schofield, B., & Fitzpatrick, D. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-06-02112.1997 · Cited by 1,119
Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry
Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379549a0 · Cited by 929
Cited by
Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways
Fang, F., & He, S. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1537 · Cited by 477
Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible ‘invisible’
Kim, C.-Y., & Blake, R. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.012 · Cited by 451
Self-citationI NFERENCE AND C OMPUTATION WITH P OPULATION C ODES
Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. S. (2003) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131112 · Cited by 434
Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.7.2 · Cited by 417
“In contrast, binocular rivalry occurs automatically for most observers with normal binocular vision (Blake, 2001).”
Spatiotemporal dynamics of continuum neural fields
Bressloff, P. C. (2012) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/3/033001 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, R.
- Venue
- Brain and Mind
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-38
- ISSN
- 1389-1987 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3300
- OpenAlex
- W1556105300
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1017925416289
- The paper
- Blake, R. (2001). A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies. Brain and Mind. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1017925416289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
