The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new single model and derived algorithms for the satellite shot planning problem using graph theory concepts
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“exact methods provide strong optimality guarantees but are computationally limited to small problem instances.”
From Scheduling multiple agile Earth observation satellites with multiple observations (2026) · cites this paper as Gabrel et al., 1997
Citations
Cites
(1979) · Cited by 43,841
(1973) · North-Holland mathematical library · doi:10.1016/s0924-6509(09)x7013-3 · Cited by 3,006
Minoux, M., & Minoux, M. (1995) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 293
Les problèmes d'ordonnancement
Gotha (1993) · RAIRO - Operations Research · doi:10.1051/ro/1993270100771 · Cited by 62
Moore, J. E. (1975) · A I I E Transactions · doi:10.1080/05695557508974982 · Cited by 11
Gaspin, C. (1989) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/s0736-5853(89)80013-9 · Cited by 8
Gabrel, V. (1994) · Cited by 7
Self-citationPlanERS-1: an expert planning system for generating spacecraft mission plane
Fuchs, J., Gasquet, A., Olalainty, B., et al. (1990) · Cited by 5
Planification à moyen terme de la production d'un satellite défilant et ensembles stables
Gabrel, V. (1995) · RAIRO - Operations Research · doi:10.1051/ro/1995290201551 · Cited by 3
Self-citationTessier, C. (1988) · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- F. Fabiani, Planification de missions d'un satellite d'observation, Mémoire de DEA, ENSAE, Toulouse, 1992.
- J.F. Fuchs, A. Gasquet, B. Olalainty and K. Currie, An expert planning system for generating spacecraft mission plans, Proc. International Conference on Expert Planning Systems, 1990.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selecting and scheduling observations of agile satellites
Lemaı̂tre, M., Verfaillie, G., Jouhaud, F., Lachiver, J.-M., & Bataille, N. (2002) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s1270-9638(02)01173-2 · Cited by 472
Wang, X., Wu, G., Xing, L., & Pedrycz, W. (2021) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2020.2997050 · Cited by 260
Peng, G., Dewil, R., Verbeeck, C., Gunawan, A., Xing, L., & Vansteenwegen, P. (2019) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2019.05.030 · Cited by 113
An exact algorithm for agile earth observation satellite scheduling with time-dependent profits
Peng, G., Song, G., Xing, L., Gunawan, A., & Vansteenwegen, P. (2020) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2020.104946 · Cited by 93
Scheduling multiple agile Earth observation satellites with multiple observations
Wang, X., Han, C., & Leus, R. (2026) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.042 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabrel, V., Moulet, A., Murat, C., & Paschos, V. T.
- Venue
- Annals of Operations Research
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 115-134
- ISSN
- 0254-5330 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9338
- OpenAlex
- W2162328434
- Semantic Scholar
- 24c59569014d964842001eec0c7c779eb21e242a
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Operations Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
- Keywords
- graph model, sequencing algorithms, technological constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
