Cited by 213Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsBarrier Structure and Function Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Indirect Evidence that Drug Brain Targeting Using Polysorbate 80-Coated Polybutylcyanoacrylate Nanoparticles Is Related to Toxicity

Olivier, Jean-Christophe, Fenart, Laurence, Chauvet, Romain, Pariat, Claudine, Cecchelli, Roméo, Couet, William·1999·Pharmaceutical Research

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the mechanism underlying the entry of the analgesic peptide dalargin into brain using biodegradable polybutylcyanoacrylate (PBCA) nanoparticles (NP) overcoated with polysorbate 80.Methods The investigations were carried out with PBCA NP and with non biodegradable polystyrene (PS) NP (200 nm diameter). Dalargin adsorption was assessed by HPLC. Its entry into the CNS in mice was evaluated using the tail-flick procedure. Locomotor activity measurements were performed to compare NP toxicities. BBB permeabilization by PBCA NP was studied in vitro using a coculture of bovine brain capillary endothelial cells and rat astrocytes.Results Dalargin loading was 11.7 microg/mg on PBCA NP and 16.5 microg/ mg on PS NP. Adding polysorbate 80 to NP led to a complete desorption. Nevertheless, dalargin associated with PBCA NP and polysorbate 80 induced a potent and prolonged analgesia, which could not be obtained using PS NP in place of PBCA NP. Locomotor activity dramatically decreased in mice dosed with PBCA NP, but not with PS NP. PBCA NP also caused occasional mortality. In vitro, PBCA NP (10 microg/ml) induced a permeabilization of the BBB model.Conclusions A non specific permeabilization of the BBB, probably related to the toxicity of the carrier, may account for the CNS penetration of dalargin associated with PBCA NP and polysorbate 80.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018947208597

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–213 of 213

Metadata

Authors
Olivier, J.-C., Fenart, L., Chauvet, R., Pariat, C., Cecchelli, R., & Couet, W.
Affiliations
  • Université de Poitiers (FR)
  • Université de Rennes (FR)
Corresponding author
Olivier, Jean-Christophe
Venue
Pharmaceutical Research
Published
1999-12
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1836-1842
ISSN
  • 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-904X
OpenAlex
W1526328115
Cited by
213
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
dalargin, polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles, Tween 80, brain drug delivery, blood-brain barrier permeabilization, analgesic peptides, nanoparticle toxicity, polystyrene nanoparticles, brain microvascular endothelial cells, astrocytes, locomotor activity
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Cells, Cultured, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Enbucrilate, Endothelium, Excipients, Male, Microspheres, Motor Activity, Pain Measurement, Polysorbates, Enkephalin, Leucine-2-Alanine, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review