Cited by 395Distributed and Parallel Computing SystemsNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlCloud Computing and Resource Management

Dynamically forecasting network performance using the Network Weather Service

Wolski, Rich·1998·Cluster Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019025230054

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiments on the dotresearch.org network and 40 gigabit/s NSF TeraGrid network datasets show that the NN outperforms the NWS bandwidth forecasting models with an error rate of up to 8 and 121.9% for MLP-NN and NWS, respectively.

    “40 gigabit/s NSF TeraGrid network datasets show that the NN outperforms the NWS bandwidth forecasting models with an error rate of up to 8 and 121.9% for MLP-NN and NWS, respectively.”
  • Eswaradass et al. propose a MLP-NN-based bandwidth prediction system for Grid environments and compare it to the Network Weather Service (NWS) bandwidth forecasting AR models for traffic monitoring and measurement.

    “[141] propose a MLP-NN-based bandwidth prediction system for Grid environments and compare it to the Network Weather Service (NWS) [480] bandwidth forecasting AR models for traffic monitoring and measurement.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolski, R.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Wolski, Rich
Venue
Cluster Computing
Published
1998-05
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
119-132
ISSN
  • 1386-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7543
OpenAlex
W1489252188
Cited by
395
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
23.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cluster Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Centre for Supercomputing Applications
  • University of Oregon
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
metacomputing, quality of service guarantees, job scheduling, dynamic resource allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review