Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States)

Open access
Bernstein, Leslie, Allen, Mark, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Deapen, Dennis, Horn-Ross, Pamela L., Peel, David, Pinder, Richard, Reynolds, Peggy, Sullivan-Halley, Jane, West, Dee, Wright, William, Ziogas, Al, Ross, Ronald K.·2002·Cancer Causes & Control

Abstract

Objective: To determine risk factor profiles and cancer incidence rates among participants in the California Teachers Study (CTS), a study designed to document high breast cancer incidence rates of California teachers and to investigate emergent hypotheses in the etiology of breast and other cancers. Methods: The CTS is a prospective study of 133,479 California female teachers and administrators, established in 1995–1996 with members of the California State Teachers Retirement System completing a detailed mailed questionnaire regarding possible risk factors for breast and other cancers. Cancer outcomes were identified by linkage with the California Cancer Registry. Results: CTS participants have a 51% higher age-standardized invasive breast cancer incidence rate and a 67% higher in-situ breast cancer incidence rate than would be expected based on race-specific statewide rates after three years of follow-up. CTS participants also have substantially elevated rates of endometrial cancer (rate ratio, RR = 1.72), ovarian cancer (RR = 1.28), melanoma (RR = 1.59), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR = 1.53), and leukemia (RR = 1.28), but low rates of invasive cervix cancer (RR = 0.53) and lung cancer (RR = 0.66). Conclusions: CTS members have high rates of several major cancers, particularly breast cancer, and low rates of lung and cervix cancer. Although late age at first birth can explain a portion of the observed excess risk of breast cancer in this cohort, the unique risk factor profile of CTS members may account for much of their higher risk of breast and selected other cancers. The CTS offers a rich resource for future studies of cancer risk and of women's health, in general.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019552126105

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Bernstein, L., Allen, M., Anton-Culver, H., Deapen, D., Horn-Ross, P. L., Peel, D., Pinder, R., Reynolds, P., Sullivan-Halley, J., West, D., Wright, W., Ziogas, A., & Ross, R. K.
Venue
Cancer Causes & Control
Published
2002-09
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
625-635
ISSN
  • 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7225
OpenAlex
W2155889075
Cited by
251
References
3
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1019552126105
The paper
Bernstein, L., Allen, M., Anton-Culver, H., Deapen, D., Horn-Ross, P. L., Peel, D., Pinder, R., Reynolds, P., Sullivan-Halley, J., West, D., Wright, W., Ziogas, A., & Ross, R. K. (2002). High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States). Cancer Causes & Control. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1019552126105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.