Cited by 216Nutritional Studies and DietCancer Risks and FactorsGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Recent diet and breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study (USA)

Open access
Horn-Ross, Pamela L., Hoggatt, K.J., West, Dee W., Krone, Melissa R., Stewart, Susan L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bernstein, Leslie, Deapen, Dennis +6 more·2002·Cancer Causes & Control

Abstract

Objective The impact, if any, on breast cancer risk of modifying adult dietary intake is an area of much interest. We take the opportunity to address the relationship between recent adult diet and breast cancer risk during the first two years of follow-up of the large California Teachers Study cohort. Methods Of the 111.526 at-risk cohort members who resided in California and completed a baseline dietary assessment, 711 were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer after joining the cohort and before January 1998. Average daily nutrient intake was computed based on a food-frequency questionnaire assessing usual dietary intake and portion size during the year prior to joining the cohort. Incident breast cancers were identified through the California Cancer Registry and follow-up for death and confirmation of continued California residence utilized a variety of data sources. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate relative hazards. Results The following components of recent dietary intake were not associated with breast cancer risk: energy, fat, fiber, antioxidant vitamins, and phytoestrogens. Only recent average alcohol consumption of 20 or more grams per day (approximately two or more glasses of wine) was associated with increased risk (RR= 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-2.0 compared to non-drinkers; P(trend) = 0.01 across quintiles). Conclusion With the exception of alcohol consumption, this study provides no evidence that recent macro- or micronutrient composition of adult diet is likely to have a direct effect on breast cancer risk. Some reduction of alcohol consumption among those consuming more than one drink per day may be beneficial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1015786030864

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of 11 prospective cohort studies reporting on risk of primary breast cancer, one (9%) showed soy isoflavone intake was associated with overall reduced risk, while the remaining studies showed no associations.

    “Of 11 studies reporting on risk of primary breast cancer, one (9%) showed that soy isoflavone intake was associated with overall reduced risk of breast cancer [116], while the remaining studies showed no associations [99,104,105,107-109,111,113-115,117].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Longnecker MP (1994) Alcoholic beverage consumption in rela- tion to risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis and review. Cancer Causes Control 5: 73-82.
  2. Messina MJ, Persky V, Setchell KDR, Barnes S (1994) Soy intake and cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Nutr Cancer 21: 113-131.
  3. Willett W, Lenart E (1998) Reproducibility and validity of food- frequency questionnaires. In: Willett W, ed. Nutritional Epidemi- ology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 101-147.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horn-Ross, P. L., Hoggatt, K. J., West, D. W., Krone, M. R., Stewart, S. L., Anton-Culver, H., Bernstein, L., Deapen, D., Peel, D., Pinder, R., Reynolds, P., Ross, R. K., Wright, W., & Ziogas, A.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • California Health and Human Services Agency (US)
Venue
Cancer Causes & Control
Published
2002-06
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
407-415
ISSN
  • 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7225
OpenAlex
W1512059116
Cited by
216
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA077398, CA 77398)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
breast cancer risk, alcohol consumption, dietary fat, dietary fiber, antioxidant vitamins, phytoestrogens, energy intake, California Teachers Study, women's diet
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Breast Neoplasms, California, Diet, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Registries, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review