Cited by 95Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Information and CryptographyTheoretical and Computational Physics

Entanglement, Quantum Phase Transitions, and Density Matrix Renormalization

Open access
Osborne, Tobias J., Nielsen, Michael A.·2002·Quantum Information Processing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019601218492

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A highly entangled ground state is at the heart of a large variety of collective quantum phenomena.

    “On the other hand, entanglement is appointed to play a central role in the study of strongly correlated quantum systems [7][8][9], since a highly entangled ground state is at the heart of a large variety of collective quantum phenomena.”

    From Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena (2003) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]E. Schr¨ odinger, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31 , 555 (1935).
  2. [5]M. A. Nielsen, Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico (1998), quant-ph/0011036. · arXiv
  3. [8]R. M. Noack and S. R. White, in Density-matrix renormalization (Dresden, 1998) (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
  4. [17]H. Barnum (1999), quant-ph/9910072. · arXiv
  5. [19]S. Rommer and S. ¨ Ostlund, in Density-matrix renormalization (Dresden, 1998) (Springer, Berlin, 1999), pp. 6789.
  6. [22]D. Gunlycke, S. Bose, V. M. Kendon, and V. Vedral (2001), quant-ph/0102137. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osborne, T. J., & Nielsen, M. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Quantum Information Processing
Published
2002-04
Volume
1
Issue
1-2
Pages
45-53
ISSN
  • 1570-0755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1332
OpenAlex
W1886196868
Cited by
95
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum Information Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
quantum entanglement, quantum phase transitions, density matrix renormalization group, renormalization, entanglement preservation, quantum information, quantum many-body systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review