Cited by 176Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsWind and Air Flow Studies

Contrasting vertical structures of nocturnal boundary layers

Mahrt, L., Vickers, Dean·2002·Boundary-Layer Meteorology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1019964720989

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahrt, L., & Vickers, D.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Venue
Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Published
2002-11
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
351-363
ISSN
  • 0006-8314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1472
OpenAlex
W1235304112
Cited by
176
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Boundary-Layer Meteorology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
Keywords
nocturnal boundary layer, vertical structure, residual layer, turbulence transport, boundary layer depth, CASES-99, sonic anemometer measurements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review