The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Being Bayesian About Network Structure. A Bayesian Approach to Structure Discovery in Bayesian Networks
Open accessAbstract
In many multivariate domains, we are interested in analyzing the dependency structure of the underlying distribution, e.g., whether two variables are in direct interaction. We can represent dependency structures using Bayesian network models. To analyze a given data set, Bayesian model selection attempts to find the most likely (MAP) model, and uses its structure to answer these questions. However, when the amount of available data is modest, there might be many models that have non-negligible posterior. Thus, we want compute the Bayesian posterior of a feature, i.e., the total posterior probability of all models that contain it. In this paper, we propose a new approach for this task. We first show how to efficiently compute a sum over the exponential number of networks that are consistent with a fixed order over network variables. This allows us to compute, for a given order, both the marginal probability of the data and the posterior of a feature. We then use this result as the basis for an algorithm that approximates the Bayesian posterior of a feature. Our approach uses a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, but over orders rather than over network structures. The space of orders is smaller and more regular than the space of structures, and has much a smoother posterior “landscape”. We present empirical results on synthetic and real-life datasets that compare our approach to full model averaging (when possible), to MCMC over network structures, and to a non-Bayesian bootstrap approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Causation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1754.001.0001 · Cited by 4,521
Model Selection and Accounting for Model Uncertainty in Graphical Models Using Occam's Window
Madigan, D., & Raftery, A. E. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476894 · Cited by 1,205
Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data
Heckerman, D., Geiger, D., & Chickering, D. M. (1994) · Uncertainty Proceedings 1994 · doi:10.1016/b978-1-55860-332-5.50042-0 · Cited by 261
Cited by
Machine learning: a review of classification and combining techniques
Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I. D., & Pintelas, P. E. (2006) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-007-9052-3 · Cited by 1,582
D’ya Like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discovery
Vowels, M. J., Camgoz, N. C., & Bowden, R. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3527154 · Cited by 237
A Relation-Augmented Fully Convolutional Network for Semantic Segmentation in Aerial Scenes
Mou, L., Hua, Y., & Zhu, X. X. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01270 · Cited by 183
Faisal, A., Dondelinger, F., Husmeier, D., & Beale, C. M. (2010) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.06.005 · Cited by 61
Helmlinger, G., Al-Huniti, N., Aksenov, S., Peskov, K., Hallow, K. M., Chu, L., Boulton, D., Eriksson, U., Hamrén, B., Lambert, C., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2017.05.028 · Cited by 33
Causal Structure Learning: A Combinatorial Perspective
Squires, C., & Uhler, C. (2023) · Foundations of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10208-022-09581-9 · Cited by 31
(2014) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, N., & Koller, D.
- Venue
- Machine Learning
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 95-125
- ISSN
- 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0565
- OpenAlex
- W2144731007
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.