Cited by 4,521Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferencePhilosophy and History of ScienceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Causation, Prediction, and Search

Spirtes, Peter, Glymour, Clark, Scheines, Richard·2001·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

The authors address the assumptions and methods that allow us to turn observations into causal knowledge, and use even incomplete causal knowledge in planning and prediction to influence and control our environment. What assumptions and methods allow us to turn observations into causal knowledge, and how can even incomplete causal knowledge be used in planning and prediction to influence and control our environment? In this book Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour, and Richard Scheines address these questions using the formalism of Bayes networks, with results that have been applied in diverse areas of research in the social, behavioral, and physical sciences. The authors show that although experimental and observational study designs may not always permit the same inferences, they are subject to uniform principles. They axiomatize the connection between causal structure and probabilistic independence, explore several varieties of causal indistinguishability, formulate a theory of manipulation, and develop asymptotically reliable procedures for searching over equivalence classes of causal models, including models of categorical data and structural equation models with and without latent variables. The authors show that the relationship between causality and probability can also help to clarify such diverse topics in statistics as the comparative power of experimentation versus observation, Simpson's paradox, errors in regression models, retrospective versus prospective sampling, and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/1754.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2001-01-29
OpenAlex
W4302423442
Cited by
4,521
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 209 · 2025: 373 · 2024: 411 · 2023: 399 · 2022: 357 · 2021: 273 · 2020: 248 · 2019: 304 · 2018: 212 · 2017: 200 · 2016: 190 · 2015: 159 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 154 · 2012: 107
FWCI
7.07
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-08-FRAL-0010)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
causal discovery, causal inference, Bayesian networks, causal models, manipulation, structural equation modeling, latent variables, Simpson's paradox, feature selection, regression error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review