Cited by 49Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectCrime Patterns and Interventions

Nonphysical Abuse Among Batterer Program Participants

Gondolf, Edward W., Heckert, D. Alex, Kimmel, Chad M.·2002·Journal of Family Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020304715511

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 49

Authors
Gondolf, E. W., Heckert, D. A., & Kimmel, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Western Michigan University (US)
Corresponding author
Gondolf, Edward W.
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2002-12
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
293-314
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W1516858324
Cited by
49
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
intimate partner violence, batterer intervention programs, risk indicators, domestic violence, verbal abuse, threats, emotional control, program dropout, physical abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review