The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Consistent with best practices of the constant comparative method, 22,23 the study team cycled through multiple iterations of themes related to care setting, looking for unexpected and disconfirming evidence.”
From Care setting transitions for people with dementia: Qualitative perspectives of current and former care partners (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,525
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852
(2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77282-0_6 · Cited by 17,411
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
(1992) · Cited by 2,855
(1993) · Cited by 2,636
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Morse, J. M. & Field, P. A. (1998). Nursing Research of Qualitative Approaches. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
- Wester, F. (1995). Strategieë n voor kwalitatief onderzoek. Muiderberg: Coutinho.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 · Cited by 10,865
A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed
Crowe, M., & Sheppard, L. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.008 · Cited by 261
Indigenous mental health in a changing climate: A systematic scoping review of the global literature
Middleton, J., Cunsolo, A., Jones-Bitton, A., Wright, C. J., & Harper, S. L. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab68a9 · Cited by 212
Factors Influencing the Functioning of Data Teams
Schildkamp, K., & Poortman, C. (2015) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811511700403 · Cited by 185
Khan, M. S., Meghani, A., Liverani, M., Roychowdhury, I., & Parkhurst, J. (2018) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czx145 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Boeije, H.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Boeije, Hennie
- ORCID
- Boeije, Hennie
- Venue
- Quality and Quantity
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391-409
- ISSN
- 0033-5177 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7845
- OpenAlex
- W1566718566
- Semantic Scholar
- 2db43b1826a2795a4abfa3afc8802a1cdef76885
- Cited by
- 3,073
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 149 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 200 · 2022: 199 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 240 · 2019: 231 · 2018: 198 · 2017: 181 · 2016: 190 · 2015: 188 · 2014: 163 · 2013: 140 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 27.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.library.uu.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Quality & Quantity (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Keywords
- constant comparative method, grounded theory, qualitative interview analysis, multiple sclerosis, patient experience, spousal caregivers, step-by-step approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
