Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Taking Southern African Ceramic Studies into the Twenty-First Century: A Zimbabwean Perspective

Pikirayi, Innocent·1999·African Archaeological Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021628700539

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bennett, W. J., Jr., and Blakely, A. J. (1989). Morphology, composition and stratigraphy: A data base concept for ceramic study and publication. In Blakely, A. J., and Bennett, W. J., Jr. (eds.), Analysis and Publication of Ceramics: The Computer Data Base in Archaeology, BAR International Series 551, pp. 1–18.
  2. Fagan, B. M. (1967). Iron Age Cultures in Zambia, Vol. 1. Kalomo and Kangila, Chatto and Windus, London.
  3. Fagan, B. M., Phillipson, D. W., and Daniels, S. G. H. (1969). Iron Age Cultures in Zambia: Dambwa, Ingombe Illede and the Tonga, Chatto and Windus, London.
  4. Hall, M. (1983). Tribes, traditions and numbers: The American model in southern African Iron Age ceramic studies. South African Archaeological Bulletin 38: 51–57. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hall, M. (1984). Pots and politics: Ceramic interpretations in southern Africa. World Archaeology 15(3): 262–273. · DOI
  6. Huffman, T. N. (1978). The origins of Leopard's Kopje: an 11th century Difaqane. Arnoldia 8(23): 1–23.
  7. Huffman, T. N. (1980). Ceramics, classifications and Iron Age entities. African Studies 29(2): 123–174. · DOI
  8. Huffman, T. N. (1989). Ceramics, settlements and Late Iron Age migrations. African Archaeological Review 7: 155–182. · DOI
  9. Hulthen, B. (1988). Report on a pilot investigation of ceramics from Mozambique and Zimbabwe. In Sinclair, P. J. J., Tornblom, M., Bohm C., Sigvalius, B., and Hulthen, B. (eds.), Analyses of Slag, Iron, Ceramics and Animal Bones from Mozambique, Eduarde Mondlane University and Central Board of National Antiquities, Stockholm, pp. 35–44.
  10. Lindahl, A., and Matenga, E. (1995). Present and Past: Ceramics and Homesteads: An Ethnoarchaeological Project in the Buhera District, Zimbabwe, Studies in African Archaeology 11, Acta Arkeologica Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
  11. Majewski, T., and O'Brien, B. J. (1989). Practical data base construction for historical period ceramic analysis. In Blakely, J. A., and Bennett, W. J., Jr. (eds.), Analysis and Publication of Ceramics: The Computer Data Base in Archaeology, BAR International Series 551, pp. 81–97.
  12. Ndoro, W. (1995). Towards the meaning and symbolism of archaeological pottery assemblages. In Pwiti, G., and Soper, R. (eds.), Aspects of African Archaeology: Papers from the 10th Congress of the PanAfrican Association for Prehistory and Related Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, pp. 773–780.
  13. Pikirayi, I. (1997a). Pots, people and culture: An overview of ceramic studies in Zimbabwe. In Pwiti, G. (ed.), Caves, Monuments and Texts: Zimbabwean Archaeology Today, Studies in African Archaeology 14, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, Uppsala, pp. 69–87.
  14. Pikirayi, I. (1997b). The pottery of the historical Mutapa state: An examination of the local ceramics from some trading centres in northern Zimbabwe. Zimbabwea 5: 30–47.
  15. Pwiti, G. (1996). Continuity and Change: An Archaeological Study of Farming Communities in Northern Zimbabwe, AD 500–1700, Studies in African Archaeology 13, Acta Arkeologica Upsaliensis, Uppsala.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pikirayi, I.
Venue
African Archaeological Review
Published
1999-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
185-189
ISSN
  • 0263-0338
  • 1572-9842
Cited by
8
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review