The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Taking Southern African Ceramic Studies into the Twenty-First Century: A Zimbabwean Perspective
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
African-centred knowledge has been ignored in addressing the problem of social context in pottery studies.
“For so long African-centred knowledge has been ignored in addressing this problem”
From Nyanga pottery and the Manyika ethnohistory: towards a decolonised archaeology of the Nyanga agricultural complex (2021) · cites this paper as Pikirayi, 1999
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Bennett, W. J., Jr., and Blakely, A. J. (1989). Morphology, composition and stratigraphy: A data base concept for ceramic study and publication. In Blakely, A. J., and Bennett, W. J., Jr. (eds.), Analysis and Publication of Ceramics: The Computer Data Base in Archaeology, BAR International Series 551, pp. 1–18.
- Fagan, B. M. (1967). Iron Age Cultures in Zambia, Vol. 1. Kalomo and Kangila, Chatto and Windus, London.
- Fagan, B. M., Phillipson, D. W., and Daniels, S. G. H. (1969). Iron Age Cultures in Zambia: Dambwa, Ingombe Illede and the Tonga, Chatto and Windus, London.
- Hall, M. (1983). Tribes, traditions and numbers: The American model in southern African Iron Age ceramic studies. South African Archaeological Bulletin 38: 51–57. · DOI · Paper page
- Hall, M. (1984). Pots and politics: Ceramic interpretations in southern Africa. World Archaeology 15(3): 262–273. · DOI
- Huffman, T. N. (1978). The origins of Leopard's Kopje: an 11th century Difaqane. Arnoldia 8(23): 1–23.
- Huffman, T. N. (1980). Ceramics, classifications and Iron Age entities. African Studies 29(2): 123–174. · DOI
- Huffman, T. N. (1989). Ceramics, settlements and Late Iron Age migrations. African Archaeological Review 7: 155–182. · DOI
- Hulthen, B. (1988). Report on a pilot investigation of ceramics from Mozambique and Zimbabwe. In Sinclair, P. J. J., Tornblom, M., Bohm C., Sigvalius, B., and Hulthen, B. (eds.), Analyses of Slag, Iron, Ceramics and Animal Bones from Mozambique, Eduarde Mondlane University and Central Board of National Antiquities, Stockholm, pp. 35–44.
- Lindahl, A., and Matenga, E. (1995). Present and Past: Ceramics and Homesteads: An Ethnoarchaeological Project in the Buhera District, Zimbabwe, Studies in African Archaeology 11, Acta Arkeologica Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
- Majewski, T., and O'Brien, B. J. (1989). Practical data base construction for historical period ceramic analysis. In Blakely, J. A., and Bennett, W. J., Jr. (eds.), Analysis and Publication of Ceramics: The Computer Data Base in Archaeology, BAR International Series 551, pp. 81–97.
- Ndoro, W. (1995). Towards the meaning and symbolism of archaeological pottery assemblages. In Pwiti, G., and Soper, R. (eds.), Aspects of African Archaeology: Papers from the 10th Congress of the PanAfrican Association for Prehistory and Related Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, pp. 773–780.
- Pikirayi, I. (1997a). Pots, people and culture: An overview of ceramic studies in Zimbabwe. In Pwiti, G. (ed.), Caves, Monuments and Texts: Zimbabwean Archaeology Today, Studies in African Archaeology 14, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University, Uppsala, pp. 69–87.
- Pikirayi, I. (1997b). The pottery of the historical Mutapa state: An examination of the local ceramics from some trading centres in northern Zimbabwe. Zimbabwea 5: 30–47.
- Pwiti, G. (1996). Continuity and Change: An Archaeological Study of Farming Communities in Northern Zimbabwe, AD 500–1700, Studies in African Archaeology 13, Acta Arkeologica Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nyamushosho, R. T., Chipangura, N., Pasipanodya, T. B., Bandama, F., Chirikure, S., & Manyanga, M. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06609 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Pikirayi, I.
- Venue
- African Archaeological Review
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-189
- ISSN
- 0263-0338
- 1572-9842
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review