CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 280Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchool Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparison of Current Practice in School-Based Substance Use Prevention Programs with Meta-Analysis Findings

Ennett, Susan T., Ringwalt, Christopher L., Thorne, Judy, Rohrbach, Louise Ann, Vincus, Amy, Simons-Rudolph, Ashley, Jones, Shelton·2003·Prevention Science
DOI 10.1023/a:1021777109369
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The series of seminal meta-analytic studies of school-based substance use prevention program studies conducted by the late Nancy S. Tobler and colleagues concluded that programs with content focused on social influences' knowledge, drug refusal skills, and generic competency skills and that use participatory or interactive teaching strategies were more effective than programs focused on knowledge and attitudes and favoring traditional didactic instruction. The present study compared current school practice against evidence-based standards for "effective content" and "effective delivery," derived from the Tobler findings. Respondents were the lead staff who taught substance use prevention in the 1998-1999 school year in a national sample of public and private schools that included middle school grades (N = 1,795). Results indicate that most providers (62.25%) taught effective content, but few used effective delivery (17.44%), and fewer still used both effective content and delivery (14.23%). Those who taught an evidence-based program (e.g., Life Skills Training, Project ALERT), however, were more likely to implement both effective content and delivery, as were those teachers who were recently trained in substance use prevention and were comfortable using interactive teaching methods. The findings indicate that the transfer to practice of research knowledge about school-based substance use prevention programming has been limited.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021777109369

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Drug Strategies. (1999). Making the grade: A guide to school drug prevention programs. Washington, DC: Drug Strategies.
  2. Gottfredson Associates. (1997). National Study of Delinquency in Schools, Principal's Questionnaire. Ellicott City, MD: Gottfredson Associates.
  3. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
  4. Shah, B. V., Barnwell, G. S., & Bieler, G. S. (1996). SUDAAN user's manual. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
  5. U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Safe and drug-free schools program: Notice of final principles of effectiveness. Federal Register, 63(014), 29902-29906.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–280 of 280

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ennett, S. T., Ringwalt, C. L., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., Vincus, A., Simons-Rudolph, A., & Jones, S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
  • Westat (United States) (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Ennett, Susan T.
ORCID
Venue
Prevention Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
DOI
10.1023/a:1021777109369
OpenAlex
W79003115
Cited by
276
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA011492, 5R01 DA11492)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
prevention program effectiveness, evidence-based practice, program content, interactive teaching methods, social influence, life skills training, Project ALERT
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Curriculum, Health Education, Humans, School Health Services, Teaching, United States, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Program Evaluation, Evidence-Based Medicine, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review