Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: unifying themes for educational psychology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EFs have been related to reasoning operations.
“and EFs have been related to reasoning operations (Dempster and Corkill, 1999; Engle and Kane, 2004; Jarosz and Wiley, 2012; Shipstead et al., 2015)”
From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Dempster and Corkill, 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 332 · Cited by 163
- Authors
- Dempster, F. N., & Corkill, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dempster, Frank N.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-88
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W96576710
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 332
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- interference, inhibition, cognitive control, at-risk students, individual differences, developmental differences, intelligence, reading comprehension, student self-regulation, retention, curriculum and instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
