Act Your Age
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The discipline of sociology lacks full appreciation of the theoretical import of age.
“I argue that the discipline of sociology lacks full appreciation of the theoretical import of age.”
From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Laz 1998
Cites
On the Significance of Age in Sociology
Riley, M. W. (1987) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095388 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework
Barrett, A. E. (2022) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-083121-043741 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Laz, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Maine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cheryl Laz
- Venue
- Sociological Forum
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-113
- ISSN
- 0884-8971 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1541147023
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociological Forum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- social construction of age, age and gender, symbolic interactionism, life course, aging, interactional work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
